Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the development of a small electronic windspeed sensor for controlling expression in a custom electronic flute. Participants explore various sensor options, including thermistors and microphones, while considering the challenges of sensitivity, size, and interference from ambient conditions.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant suggests using thermistors for airflow sensing, noting the complexity of accounting for breath, humidity, and temperature variations.
- Another participant proposes enclosing thermistors in a tube to shield them from ambient interference while measuring breath.
- There is a consideration of using a microphone to detect breath intensity, with concerns raised about distinguishing "wind" noise from the flute's tone.
- A participant mentions a homemade anemometer as a potential reference but questions its practicality for the intended application.
- Clarification is sought on the term "Expression," with a participant explaining the goal of controlling volume and tone brightness through breath intensity.
- Commercial options for similar devices are noted, with references to Yamaha and Akai as manufacturers.
- Links to additional resources and construction ideas are provided for further exploration.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express various ideas and approaches, but no consensus is reached on the best method for implementing the windspeed sensor or the definition of "Expression" in this context. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain throughout the discussion.
Contextual Notes
Challenges include the need for sensitivity in detecting breath, potential interference from ambient noise, and the complexity of integrating different sensor types effectively.