Smaller Antennas, Higher Frequencies: The Need for Size Reductions

AI Thread Summary
Antenna size is inversely related to frequency, meaning higher frequencies correspond to shorter wavelengths and allow for smaller antennas. For effective transmission of electromagnetic waves, the antenna must match the transmitter, which is crucial for radiating power efficiently. As antennas become smaller relative to the wavelength, their radiation resistance decreases, complicating power transmission. Low-frequency antennas, such as those used for long-wave radio, require large structures to be effective, while high-frequency antennas, like those in mobile phones, can be compact and efficient. Understanding these principles is essential for optimizing antenna design across various applications.
Noudi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why antenna needs to be smaller in size with higher frequencies (EM waves)? please
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Because antenna dimension is proportional to wavelength.
Wavelength = speed of light / frequency
 
Noudi said:
Why antenna needs to be smaller in size with higher frequencies (EM waves)? please

Welcome to the PF.

This introductory article should also help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio )

:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Dear.
 
Noudi said:
Why antenna needs to be smaller in size with higher frequencies (EM waves)? please
Actually, it's rather the other way round. The antenna for a high frequency (short wavelength) can be small. For low frequency, they need to be big.
When you want to launch an EM wave into space, you need to 'match' your transmitter to the antenna - in order to get the power out into space. The mechanism that causes power to be radiated (which is what the whole thing is about) ls the equivalent to a resistance for the transmitter to drive into. As the antenna gets to be a small fraction of a wavelength, this (radiation) resistance gets lower and lower - the limit being a short circuit. It is very difficult to put much power into an extremely low resistance because all the power gets dissipated in the transmitter and the connecting cable. Hence, to transmit Radio Signals at 198kHz (BBC Radio 4 Long Wave @ Droitwich) the transmitting antenna (the actual wires that radiate - not just the tower height) is a T shape with the vertical section about 100m high. Even with this massive structure, the antenna is not very efficient and a significant amount of power just warms up the metalwork and the ground nearby. For your Mobile phone, which uses wavelengths of much less than 1m, the antenna can be made to fit inside the case quite easily and is a pretty efficient design (for battery like).
To get good directivity, you need antennae that take up several (or even hundred) wavelengths. Hence the massive 'dishes' for radio astronomy.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top