What is the Smallest Possible Wavelength of Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scupydog
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Wavelengths of light vary significantly, with gamma rays having the shortest wavelengths, sometimes less than 10 picometers. The discussion explores the theoretical limits of wavelengths, suggesting that the smallest possible wavelength could be the Planck length (1.616e-35 meters), where quantum effects dominate. Conversely, extremely low frequencies can reach wavelengths around 100 megameters. The relationship between wavelength and energy is highlighted, indicating that the smallest wavelength corresponds to the highest energy of a photon. Ultimately, while wavelengths can approach infinity or zero, they cannot actually reach these extremes due to the constraints of quantum mechanics and relativistic effects.
scupydog
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Bob S said:
Wavelengths vary over many orders of magnitude; AM radio is about 300 meter wavelength, FM about 3 m, 1 GHz about 30 cm, infrared about 1 to 100 microns, red light about 600 nanometers, blue light about 400 nanometers, etc.
The above quote is from another thread about a month ago, so i started another thread.

As above...red light about 600 nanometers, blue light about 400 nanometers, so what could the smallest possible wavelength of light be or is it infinely small?

or the longest possible wavelength for that matter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean the smallest wavelength of visible light or any type?

Gamma rays have the shortest wavelengths of any other type of electromagnetism. They can have wavelengths of less than 10 picometre.

On the other hand, Extremely low frequency is abought \lambda=100Mm
 
Last edited:
You might say that the smallest wavelength possible would be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length" (1.616e-35 metres) which is the smallest distance predicted before quantum effects reduce spacetime to a quantum foam.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stratosphere said:
Do you mean the smallest wavelength of visible light or any type?

Gamma rays have the shortest wavelengths of any other type of electromagnetism. They can have wavelengths of less than 10 picometre.

On the other hand, Extremely low frequency is abought \lambda=100Mm

stevebd1 said:
You might say that the smallest wavelength possible would be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length" (1.616e-35 metres) which is the smallest distance predicted before quantum effects reduce spacetime to a quantum foam.

Thx for your replies, but they really don't answer my question...

Could the smallest/longest wavelength be ascosciated with zero point energy?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Possibly the longest wavelength of light can be associated with a zero-point energy, but the smallest wavelength of light is associated with the highest energy possible in one photon. These are probably limited by Quantum Mechanics, though I'm not sure.

The highest and lowest wavelengths are, naively, as close to infinity and zero as possible, disregarding quantum effects. These can occur as you get red/blue shifted and as you get closer and closer to the speed of light. We can see that from the relativistic doppler shift:
\lambda_0=\sqrt{\frac{1+\frac{v}{c}}{1-\frac{v}{c}}}\lambda_s
Although since you can never achieve the speed of light the wavelengths will never achieve infinity or zero.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top