Snell's Law Variation: Expressing with Cosines

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Snell's law
AI Thread Summary
Snell's Law traditionally expresses the relationship between the angles of incidence and refraction using sines, but a discussion arose about expressing it with cosines instead. While it is possible to define angles based on their relationship to the surface rather than the normal, this approach could lead to confusion, as it deviates from conventional definitions. The original poster seeks a formulation that uses only the cosine of the angle of incidence without any adjustments. However, the consensus suggests that such a formulation may not be feasible without compromising clarity and standard terminology in optics. Overall, the traditional sine-based expression remains the most accurate and widely understood method for applying Snell's Law.
Cider
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Is there a way to express Snell's Law using cosines of the angles of incidence instead of the sines without the cosines being squared? If no one here knows, is there anywhere I could look into this question?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Note that

\sin \theta =\cos(\theta - \frac{\pi}{2} )

Also,

cos(-x) = cos(x), therefore:

\cos(\theta - \frac{\pi}{2} ) = \cos( \frac{\pi}{2} - \theta)

pi/2 - theta = 90 degrees - theta = the angle the ray makes with the *surface* (instead of with the normal)

So IF you use angles of incidence and reflection defined as the angles the rays make with the surface instead of the angles they make with the normal to the surface, THEN Snell's law would indeed be expressed in terms of the cosines of THOSE angles. However, I would not encourage you to do this, because that is not the conventional definition for angles of incidence and reflection in optics. If you use that definition without telling somebody, and claim the angle of incidence is 35 degrees, he will think you are talking about the angle wrt the normal, which would actually be 55 degrees in that case.
 
Sorry, I probably should have made myself more clear. I need the equation to use only \cos \theta with no subtractions or additions within the cosine. And \theta has to be the angle of incidence. It cannot be the compliment to that angle.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...

Similar threads

Back
Top