I'm trying to derive the SO(2,1) algebra from the SO(3) algebra.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The generators for SO(3) are given by:

[tex]M^{ij}_{ab}=i*(\delta_{a}^{i}\delta_{b}^{j}-\delta_{b}^{i}\delta_{a}^{j}) [/tex]

where "a" represents the row, and "b" represents the column, and "ij" represents the generator (12=spin in 3 direction, 23=spin in 1 direction, etc.).

To get SO(2,1), I thought you just raised the "a" term by using the metric tensor:

[tex]M^{(ij)a}_{b}=i*(g^{ai}\delta_{b}^{j}-\delta_{b}^{i}g^{aj}) [/tex]

and took the commutators of the M^{ij}with each other to derive the Lie Algebra.

But when I do this I don't seem to get the Lie algebra of SO(2,1). I have some notes that say the Lie Algebra of SO(2,1) is given by:

[D,H]=-iH

[K,D]=-iK

[H,K]=2iD

where D, H, and K are the generators. I get nothing like that when I take the commutators of M^{12}, M^{23}, and M^{31}.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# SO(2,1) Lie Algebra Derivation

Loading...

Similar Threads - Algebra Derivation | Date |
---|---|

A States in usual QM/QFT and in the algebraic approach | Feb 14, 2018 |

I Dirac algebra help | Dec 25, 2017 |

A Srednicki's normalization choice for lie algebra generators | Jul 9, 2017 |

I Deriving resolution of the identity without Dirac notation | Apr 18, 2017 |

I Applying Euler-Lagrange to (real) Klein-Gordon Lagrangian | Jan 24, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**