Solving SO(3) & SU(2) Connection - Find Axis & Angle of Rotation

  • Thread starter Thread starter negru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection
negru
Messages
307
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm supposed to make a connection between SU(2) and SO(3), by using
U=\frac{a_0+i\vec{\sigma}\vec{a}}{a_0+i\vec{\sigma}\vec{a}}, where \sigma are the usual 2 dimensional Pauli matrices.
I need to find the corresponding axis and angle of rotation in three dimensions, in terms of a_0 and \vec{a}


The Attempt at a Solution


Well I can normalize this and get something like
A(1+B \vec{\sigma}\vec{a})
But how can you relate this to a three dim. rotation? It's pretty clear that the axis will be \vec{a}, but then the usual generators of SO(3) are 3x3 matrices.. Any hints please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just realized it's problem 2 of Sakurai 1985, ch 3. Any thoughts? Do you have to relate each matrix, U_z(a/2) to R_z(a), etc, or is there an easier way?
 
The numerator and denominator in your expression for U are the same, so I can't tell what the starting point is supposed to be.
 
Oops, the bottom one was with a minus.
 
There is a general formula connecting the Unitaries from SU2 and the orthogonals from SO3. This is:

F_{kl}=\frac12 \text{Tr}(U\sigma_l U^{-1}\sigma_k)

So the kl-th component of the SO3 form corresponding two can be expressed with the trace of the k, and l, th pauli matrices.

Try to derive this formula (its not that hard).

Now if the axis of rotation is \vec n and the angle of rotation is \varphi, then the general form of this orthogonal matrix that is the SO3 form is:

F_{kl}=\cos\varphi\delta_{kl}+n_k n_l(1-\cos\varphi)+\sin\varphi\sum_{m=1}^{3}\varepsilon_{kml}n_m

You can deduce this, from a diagram...

Now putting this together with the first formula you get for the SU2 form:

U_{kl}=\cos\left(\frac{\varphi}{2}\right)\cdot \delta_{kl} -i\sin\left(\frac{\varphi}{2}\right)(\vec{n}\sigma)_{kl}

The derivation is quite tedious but the end is so nice... :D
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...
Back
Top