So, what is the principal value of i^{3i}?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hbweb500
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Value
hbweb500
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
I am studying complex variables with Brown and Churchill. In it, they define the principal value of z^c, with both variables complex, to be e^{c\; \text{Log }z}, where \text{Log} is the principle value branch of the complex logarithm.

Now, suppose z = i and c = 3. We know that \text{Arg } i = \frac{\pi}{2}, so z^c = i^3 = e^{3 \pi / 2}. But is this really the principal value? Why don't we say e^{- \pi/2} is the principal value?

I ask because it seems like that is what the textbook does in one of its examples: it calculates
z^c to be something with an angle outside of -\pi < \theta \leq \pi, and just reduces it without explanation.

So, when finding the principle value of z^c after we have done the calculation, or is simply using the principle value branch logarithm enough?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Log already chooses a principal value by only taking i Arg z for the complex part. Hence it isn't necessary to introduce further conventions to get an principal value for z^c.

Anyhow, your exponential should have an i upstairs I think, so that it doesn't matter whether the exponent is -i pi/2 or i 3 pi/2.

Now if you were to take Arg of the exponential then I suppose you'd have to return a value in (-pi, pi].
 
Last edited:
Yes, you are missing an "i" in the numerator i^3= e^{3i\pi/2}= -i as you get by straight forward multiplication: i^3= (i^2)i= -i.

Doing it as e^{3 log(i)}, log(i)= i\pi/2+ 2k\pi i so that i^3= e^{3 log(i)}= e^{3i\pi/2+ 6ki\pi}= e^{3i\pi/2}e^{6ki\pi}. But e to any <b>even</b> multiple of i\pi is 1 so that <b>all</b> "branches" give the same thing. More generally, any complex number to a <b>positive integer</b> power is single valued.<br /> <br /> But, since you said "z^c with both variables complex", did you mean i^{3i}. In that case, i^{3i}= e^{3i log(i)} and now i= e^{i\pi/2} so that log(i)= i\pi/2+ 2k\pi as before, 3i \log(i)= -3\pi/2+ 5k\pi and, finally, i^{3i}= e^{-3\pi}e^{5k\pi}.<br /> <br /> Taking k= 0 gives i^{3i}= e^{-3\pi} which is the smallest positive value. Normally, the "principal value" of a calculation is the non-real value with smallest argument. When all values are real, it is the smallest positive value.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top