hbweb500
- 40
- 1
I am studying complex variables with Brown and Churchill. In it, they define the principal value of z^c, with both variables complex, to be e^{c\; \text{Log }z}, where \text{Log} is the principle value branch of the complex logarithm.
Now, suppose z = i and c = 3. We know that \text{Arg } i = \frac{\pi}{2}, so z^c = i^3 = e^{3 \pi / 2}. But is this really the principal value? Why don't we say e^{- \pi/2} is the principal value?
I ask because it seems like that is what the textbook does in one of its examples: it calculates
z^c to be something with an angle outside of -\pi < \theta \leq \pi, and just reduces it without explanation.
So, when finding the principle value of z^c after we have done the calculation, or is simply using the principle value branch logarithm enough?
Now, suppose z = i and c = 3. We know that \text{Arg } i = \frac{\pi}{2}, so z^c = i^3 = e^{3 \pi / 2}. But is this really the principal value? Why don't we say e^{- \pi/2} is the principal value?
I ask because it seems like that is what the textbook does in one of its examples: it calculates
z^c to be something with an angle outside of -\pi < \theta \leq \pi, and just reduces it without explanation.
So, when finding the principle value of z^c after we have done the calculation, or is simply using the principle value branch logarithm enough?