Soft x ray source, find radius, suggest object

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghosts_cloak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Ray Source
ghosts_cloak
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi guys!
Question:
A soft x ray source has an observed luminosity of 10^30W. The spectral shape indicates black body radiation with a peak in the emmision at 4KeV. Estimate the radius of the object. Suggest what source this might be.

So, using L=sigma*A*T^4 and the peak energy is approx kT and taking surface area to be 4*Pi*r^2 I get a radius of 550 metres, hmm low!

I then tried using Weins law and get a radius of 13.5 Km, which would be reasonable for a neutron star?

Any suggestions for the 550m radius, and which method is correct?

Thanks,

~Gaz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ghosts_cloak said:
Any suggestions for the 550m radius, and which method is correct?

The second method will be more accurate and yes, 13.5 km is a reasonable size for a neutron star. For comparison, a solar mass black hole has a Schwarzschild radius of ~3 km.
 
Hi :-)
Thanks for the reply. Yup, I thought the second method gave a better result!
I wouldn't normally have bothered about posting it on here but the lecture notes kind of hint towards the first method, and we haven't covered Weins law in this course (although we have in previous courses).
Cheers,
~Gaz
 
ghosts_cloak said:
I wouldn't normally have bothered about posting it on here but the lecture notes kind of hint towards the first method, and we haven't covered Weins law in this course (although we have in previous courses).

If it's a perfect blackbody, the peak is given exactly by Wein's Law. The other method is usually just for order of magnitude calculations (that is, to get an equivalent temperature from an energy, just divide by Boltzmann's constant).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top