Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Featured Stargazing Solar imaging and techniques

  1. Apr 13, 2018 #141
    I have a celestron cgx mount I use for this as well as another scope.
     
  2. Apr 13, 2018 #142

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    nice mount :smile:

    that now begs the question ..... what is the other scope ?
     
  3. Apr 13, 2018 #143
    Thanks, I've been happy with it so far.
    The other scope is a celestron EdgeHD 800. I use this one for smaller objects like planets and galaxies.
     
  4. Apr 14, 2018 #144

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    the one you see in my posts #102 and #129 is the Skywatcher HEQ5 PRO, also a good solid mount :)


    Sweet !! :smile:

    My main scope is the Celestron CPC925, bought that at the beginning of 2012, it's a fork mount scope on an Al/Az mount

    without going back through pages of posts, I cant remember if you have any sort of solar filter

    I commented to Sophicentaur a few posts ago that the Baader filters are good white light filters for sunspots, and some other visible light surface features. It can be purchased as a roll or sheet of film
    quite cheaply. I bought a roll of it, enough to make several filters for scopes and camera lenses etc.

    eg .....
    https://www.ozscopes.com.au/baader-astrosolar-safety-film-large-100cm-x-50cm.html
    https://www.ozscopes.com.au/accessories/eyepieces/filters?p=3

    the first link is the one I got .... will do many filters

    dunno where you live, probably some where with sales closer to you



    Dave
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2018
  5. Apr 14, 2018 #145
    Currently, I don't, but I have been thinking about getting an Ha setup for my 80mm and a white light filter for the 8" from 1000 oaks optical. I've heard many good things about their products. Here are the links below.

    http://thousandoaksoptical.com/shop/solar-filters/full-aperture-solarlite/
    http://thousandoaksoptical.com/shop/h-alpha/h-alpha-9-angstrom-complete-system/
     
  6. Apr 14, 2018 #146

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    yup, the 1000 Oaks W/L filters are good, I have 2 of them one for the CPC925 and one for the 100-400mm Canon camera lens


    hadn't seen this system before ....
    http://thousandoaksoptical.com/shop/h-alpha/h-alpha-9-angstrom-complete-system/

    just be aware that at 0.9A you are not likely to see the filaments on the face of the disk ( at minimum only a hint of the very largest ones)
    as you can see from their supplied images ... the surface features are very blurred
    0.9A is quite a broadband bandwidth. for every 0.1A you drop in bandwidth, the features become sharper and sharper
    so dropping from the 0.9A down to the 0.65 - 0.7A of my Lunt system lots more details appear.
    Dropping to the 0.45 - 0.5A, of my Daystar Chromospheric filter, is even better for surface/disk face features

    I would suggest you do some research on the different filters and spent the most your budget can afford ...
    it will possibly save disappointment and having to pend a whole bunch more money later on

    when buying expensive gear, I'm a firm believer in the saying "do it once, do it right"

    you have spent good money on excellent scopes .... DON'T skimp on a lesser quality a Ha solar filter

    hope that all makes sense ? :smile:

    Dave
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2018
  7. Apr 16, 2018 #147
    Thanks for the advice. I just started looking at Ha solar filters so I haven't really decided what to go with. The daystar filters look very nice, but you definitely pay a premium on them... $10000 for 0.3A :))
     
  8. Apr 16, 2018 #148

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Take your time, wouldn't want you to have any regrets :smile:
    it took me 25+ years to finally be able to afford a Ha filter/scope, their prices have dropped considerably ( also their quality has probably improved in that time)
    It was only last August (2017) that I finally lashed out on the Lunt LS60Tha ... AU$2599.
    The Daystar Quark Chromosphere one came a month later at around AU$1600 (~US$1295)

    My wish list for another filter, if I could afford it, a Calcium-K filter. It gives a very different view of the disk features

    29595359_1649430541803945_5600525695378232343_n.jpg

    Photo credit: Guilherme Grassmann

    he is one of the member s of the
    Uk Solar Imaging & Observations. on facebook

    a good group to see what people are up to with solar observing



    Dave‎
     
  9. Apr 20, 2018 #149

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    The Sun in Ha 21 Apr 2018
    Absolutely crap seeing conditions... even the "blue" parts of the sky between the cloud gaps had a high haze.
    Nice new active region with spots and a nice prominence showing a large detached section
    Lunt LS60THa, ASI 1600MM camera and Sharpcap capture software

    Full Disk

    180421 Ha Cap025 800x600.jpg


    AR2706

    180421 Ha Cap005.jpg


    large detached prominence

    180421 Ha Cap028sm.jpg



    Dave
     
  10. Jun 10, 2018 #150
    Thermal flows imaged with Baader Astrosolar 5.0

    30815833_2155966771098419_633583412512324716_o.jpg
     
  11. Jun 10, 2018 #151

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Hi and welcome to PF
    Can you tell us how that image was obtained? I have a Baader ASTF 80 and I'd like to be able to do more interesting images than I have obtained so far - not much more than the more obvious spots.
     
  12. Jun 10, 2018 #152
    I am using a Nikon P900 with a Baader 5.0 filter on a regular camera tripod. Usually shoot at maximum optical, 83x, sports mode for a burst of 7 in 1 second. Greater than a minute between shots, it starts to noticeably blur the final image.

    I'll post some images to walk through the process.

    The spectral response of Baader in the NIR and into the IR appears like an etalon comb response, it is a multilayer metallic sandwich - so maybe. My IR blocking filter extinguishes completely at ~ 750nm, so there are only a few candidates for the NIR terrestrial spectrum making it to my camera.

    'Grain extract' subtracts two images and adds 128. Differences between my images are caused by many things, image stabilization being the most consistent for sub-pixel offsets, then there is my inherent alignment error between the stacks.

    I have spent a few months comparing the SDO and SOHO images to the Baader/differencing technique - I am posting this because the correlations are significant. The thermal envelopes and shock waves are almost like a ghost of the UV activity seen in SDO.

    Working on OpenCV for real time video processing with this technique, will move the design over to an FPGA next month to get the frame rates up.
     

    Attached Files:

  13. Jun 10, 2018 #153
    Sun 6 10 2018 7:51MST
    Nikon P900, 83x, Baader 5.0, sports mode burst on standard camera tripod.

    Horizontal banding appears to be layers of the atmosphere. Differencing technique works well for imaging objects close to, or crossing the Sun.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Jun 10, 2018 #154

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    @Zeke_D Thanks for that. So you seem to be basically temporal high pass filtering (plus some DC offset) and that removes most of the energy - explaining the high noise, I guess. I would imagine that processing a long sequence of movie frames could allow you to dredge more patterns up from the noise with long sequences of frames (less than one minute, from your comment about gap between frames.)
    It's encouraging to see that worthwhile information can be obtained about the Sun without having to spend vast sums on filters.
     
  15. Jun 11, 2018 #155

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Hi there Zeke_D

    welcome and thanks for posting in the thread. It's good to see something a bit different
    Even with your walk-through of your processing, I have to admit, I'm still not totally sure of what I am looking at … detail wise ??
    Continue to post and keep up the explanations :smile:


    regards

    Dave
     
  16. Jun 11, 2018 #156
  17. Jun 11, 2018 #157

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

  18. Jun 11, 2018 #158

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Yes. There is just one image where there is a clear area, to the right of the Sun where 'something is going on' but I think we need some help to make more sense of some of the images in post #152.
     
  19. Jun 16, 2018 #159

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    16 June 2018, The Sun in Ha.
    Some small prom's and a large but ( for me, ill defined) active region probably mainly due to poor atmospheric conditions
    LUNT LS60THa and ASI1600MM

    180616 Ha Cap_001.jpg

    180616 Ha Cap_022sm.jpg

    180616 Ha Cap_024.jpg



    Dave
     
  20. Jun 16, 2018 #160

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Nice images as usual, Dave.
    The first and third images seem to have areas of light as if it's a slightly polished sphere, illuminated from one side. The spherical appearance is quite noticeable. How's that happening, I wonder? It's almost as if the Dodge Tool had been used. :smile:
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted