Solar Panel Efficiency: 13.1% Electric, 86.9% Thermal

  • Thread starter Thread starter xharville
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photovoltaic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency of photovoltaic solar panels, specifically noting that a panel with 13.1% efficiency converts photons into electric energy, while 86.9% is not converted and is lost as thermal energy. However, it is clarified that this energy isn't technically "lost" since it was never captured by the solar cells. Instead, the unconverted energy is absorbed as heat or reflected. The efficiency metric is defined as the ratio of electrical energy output to the total solar energy incident on the panel. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the distinction between energy loss and energy absorption in solar panel performance.
xharville
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Would it be safe to say that the energy not converted to electricity by a photovolatic panel is lost as thermal energy. Therefore if a solar panel has a 13.1 % efficiency at converting photons into electric energy then 86.9% is loss as thermal energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xharville said:
Would it be safe to say that the energy not converted to electricity by a photovolatic panel is lost as thermal energy. Therefore if a solar panel has a 13.1 % efficiency at converting photons into electric energy then 86.9% is loss as thermal energy.
It is not exactly lost because it was never captured by the solar panel cells. The efficiency of a solar panel would be the ratio of electrical energy output to the solar energy incident on the panel. The solar energy not converted to electrical energy would be absorbed by the panel material as heat, or reflected as heat or light.

AM
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top