Solid angle & flux out of cone

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding solid angles and flux in a 3D context, specifically how to calculate the flux from a light source when it forms a cone shape. The user is unsure how to translate the flux crossing a line of zero thickness into the total flux across the cone's area after rotation. There is confusion regarding the concept of a line with zero thickness, as it cannot carry flux. The user seeks clarification on whether to multiply the flux by the solid angle, questioning if the solid angle should be represented as 4πr². The conversation highlights the need for a clearer understanding of these concepts in astrophysics.
mathkid81
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was reading my astrophysics textbook and came across solid angles. I'm not sure I fully understand, for example there was a problem in the book that went as follows.

The attached "math.jpg" shows a light source (yellow) in the centre of an arc. The problem is 2D, but the arc is rotated about the x-axis to form a 3D sphere. I have the flux (F photons/sec) crossing the red line (hight h cm, zero thickness). But how do I translate that into the flux crossing the entire area after it's been rotated to be 3D.

I guess it would form a cone shape and I want the area of the face of that cone or something. So do I need to multiply the flux by the solid angle? In this case would that be 4*pi*r^2?

"math2.jpg" would represent the same problem, but just showing the cone bit. So again I have the flux crossing line of length h and zero thickness. And I want the flux that would come out of the entire cone.

I hope that makes sense. I would really appreciate any help please.

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • math.jpg
    math.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 589
  • math2.jpg
    math2.jpg
    8.2 KB · Views: 603
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi mathkid81! welcome to pf! :smile:
mathkid81 said:
I have the flux (F photons/sec) crossing the red line (hight h cm, zero thickness).

sorry, but this doesn't make sense :confused:

nothing will cross a line of zero thickness :redface:

where exactly does this problem come from?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top