Solid Insulator Sphere Inside Hollow Sphere Conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving an insulating sphere within a hollow conducting sphere. The user seeks verification of their calculations for electric fields in different regions defined by the radii of the spheres. Key points include the distribution of charge within the insulating sphere and the correct application of Gauss's law, particularly for regions inside and outside the spheres. Clarifications are made regarding the total charge enclosed within Gaussian surfaces, emphasizing that the charge is uniformly distributed rather than concentrated at a point. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately considering volume when calculating enclosed charge.
Aristotle
Messages
169
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I was looking for some practice problems in my textbook and found this problem that I was just a little stuck on. I drew the diagram from my textbook with the givens of the problem.

Screen shot 2015-02-27 at 10.14.00 AM.png

Homework Equations


∲E*dA = Q (inside) / ɛ0

The Attempt at a Solution



For r less than/equal to a:

E(4pir^2) = 3Q/ɛ ---> E = 3Q / 4*pi*ɛ(r^2)

For a<r<b:

E= -5Q/ (4*pi*r^2)

Can somebody verify with me that I've done the first two above correctly?

Also the part that I got stuck on was the r is greater than/equal to c...
I see that if r was equal to c there would be no charge, hence e-field will be zero inside the conductor. However, when r is greater than c, then there would be a charge of -5Q. How would I usually deal with the case of "greater than/equal to"?

Thank you Physics community!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aristotle said:
For r less than/equal to a:
The 3Q are distributed over the whole sphere, they are not all at the center ("inside").
Aristotle said:
For a<r<b:
I don't see why you use -5Q here.

Aristotle said:
However, when r is greater than c, then there would be a charge of -5Q.
Not only the -5Q.
Ignore the case of r exactly equal to c, that does not have a reasonable answer in this simplified model.
 
mfb said:
The 3Q are distributed over the whole sphere, they are not all at the center ("inside").
I don't see why you use -5Q here.

Not only the -5Q.
Ignore the case of r exactly equal to c, that does not have a reasonable answer in this simplified model.
Screen shot 2015-02-27 at 6.25.50 PM.png


Sorry this was the actually image from the textbook I was working on. There was a Q in the middle, but the statement of the problem still applies.

So for r is less than/equal to a, I would draw a gaussian surface at r=a and one for r<a. I notice that at r=a, the only charge enclose in the middle of the insulator is the whole +3Q and +Q. But for the r<a, the only charge inside is the +Q. Is that correct?
 
Hi welcome to PF:smile:

Aristotle said:
View attachment 79694

But for the r<a, the only charge inside is the +Q. Is that correct?

No,for r<a the charge inside is not just +Q.As it is a insulating solid sphere the charge +3Q is distributed uniformly over its total volume.So for exampleif you are considering a Gaussian surface of radius a/2 then you also have to consider the portion of +3Q distributed in the volume inside the Gaussian surface!
 
Mind_It said:
Hi welcome to PF:smile:
No,for r<a the charge inside is not just +Q.As it is a insulating solid sphere the charge +3Q is distributed uniformly over its total volume.So for exampleif you are considering a Gaussian surface of radius a/2 then you also have to consider the portion of +3Q distributed in the volume inside the Gaussian surface!
ah I see...so in that case to find Q inside , it would be Q= (4/3*pi*r^2 / 4/3*pi*a^2) * Q => Qinside = (r^2/a^2)*Q?
 
Aristotle said:
ah I see...so in that case to find Q inside , it would be Q= (4/3*pi*r^2 / 4/3*pi*a^2) * Q => Qinside = (r^2/a^2)*Q?
 
r and a should be to the third power. You have volumes here, not surfaces.
 
Back
Top