Solution to time dependent wave equation

jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that Y(x,t) = cos(kx)exp(-iwt) is a solution to the time-dependent Schrodinger wave equation.

where k is the wavenumber and w is the angular frequency

Homework Equations



Hamiltonian of Y(x,t) = ihbar d/dt Y(x,t)

The Attempt at a Solution



When I plug everything in and do the calculus, I get

(hbar / 2m)*k^2 = w

I've been paying around with it but for the life of me cannot figure out how the left hand side is equal to w even though the unit check suggests it could. So my question is, how can you simplify the left hand side to w

(hbar / 2m)*k^2 = ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't there some relation between wavenumber and angular frequency given in your textbook?:wink:
 
I can't find it. I know angular frequency is 2pi*nu and wavenumber is one over lambda. And I know nu*lambda = c, if that's the equation you mean, but still cannot get it to work...!

(hbar / 2m)(1/lambda^2) = (h/(4pi*m*lambda^2)) =...?
 
Thanks! I got it now. A quick follow up: why is it assumed that the energy component for momentum (related to the wavenumber in this problem) is entirely kinetic?

i.e.,

p = mv => p^2 = m^2 v^2 = 2m (1/2) m v^2 = 2m E => p = sqrt(2mE)
 
A free particle (I assume your problem is for a free particle, although you didn't actually say so in your problem statement) is subject to zero external forces/potentials, so its energy (in non-relativistic QM) is entirely kinetic.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top