I Solutions to equations involving linear transformations

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I have learned that for matrix theory, for ##A \vec{x} = \vec{b}##, if there exists a particular solution ##p##, then every solution looks like ##p+k##, where ##k \in \ker A##.

Can someone help me find material on this online, but only in the context of general linear transformations? For example, I want something explaining that in general solutions to ##T (\vec{x}) = \vec{b}## looks like a translation of the kernel.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you know the definition of a linear transformation? If so try using it to prove that if T is linear and T(v) = b = T(w), then v-w is in the kernel of T. Then ask yourself how this relates to your question.
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Davis 97
Another helpful thought is to visualize it geometrically. Solve ##\begin{bmatrix}2&-1\\ 0 & 0\end{bmatrix} \vec{x}=\begin{bmatrix}-3 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}## which can be drawn on a piece of paper, and think about what it means for the question: what is ##\vec{b}##, what ##\vec{p}## and what the kernel? Even three dimensional examples can easily be drawn, although it'll be a bit more work to do; on the other hand, there will be more dimensions for the kernel available.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
I have learned that for matrix theory, for ##A \vec{x} = \vec{b}##, if there exists a particular solution ##p##, then every solution looks like ##p+k##, where ##k \in \ker A##.

Can someone help me find material on this online, but only in the context of general linear transformations? For example, I want something explaining that in general solutions to ##T (\vec{x}) = \vec{b}## looks like a translation of the kernel.
Let ##\vec x = \vec p + \vec k##, where ##\vec p## is a solution to ##T(\vec p) = \vec b##, and ##\vec k## is any vector in the kernel of T. Then ##T(\vec x) = T(\vec p + \vec k) = T(\vec p) + T(\vec k) = \vec b + \vec 0 = \vec b##, by the linearity of linear transformations. The matrix form of the equation follows immediately.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top