Solve 400sinA + 500cosA = 600: Tips & Tricks

  • Thread starter Thread starter strokebow
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation 400sinA + 500cosA = 600, one must use the identity sin(A + B) = sin(A)cos(B) + cos(A)sin(B). By introducing a constant C, the equation can be transformed to find C and B, where C is determined to be 100√41. This leads to the equations Ccos(B) = 400 and Csin(B) = 500, allowing for the calculation of B as arccos(4/√41). Ultimately, the solution for A is derived as A = arcsin(6/√41) - arccos(4/√41), yielding approximate values of A around 0.318 and 1.0315. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the context of static problems in relation to the equation.
strokebow
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me how to solve...

400sinA + 500cosA = 600

Just doing some statics problems and for one of 'em I needed to find A. Can anyone tell me how its done.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First you need to know that sin(A+ B)= sin(A)cos(B)+ cos(A)sin(B) for any A, B. Because we obviously can't have cos(B)= 400 and sin(B)= 500 (sin and cos values are always <= 1), multiply that entire equation by C: Csin(A+ B)= Csin(A)cos(B)+ Ccos(A)sin(B). You want to find C and B so that C cos(B)= 400 and C sin(B)= 500. Since sin2(B)+ cos2(B)= 1, C2 cos2(B)+ C2sin2(B)= C2= (400)2+ (500)2= 160000+ 250000= 410000. C2= 410000 so C= \sqrt{410000}= 100\sqrt{41}. Now you know that C cos(B)= 100\sqrt{41}cos(B)= 400 so cos(B)= 4/\sqrt{41}. B= arccos(4/\sqrt{41}) so we now have<br /> 100\sqrt{41} sin(A+ arccos(4/\sqrt{41})= 600<br /> sin(A+ arccos(4/\sqt{41})= 6/\sqrt{41}<br /> so A+ arccos(4/\sqrt{41})= arcsin(6/\sqrt{41}) and, finally,<br /> A= arcsin(6/\sqrt{41})- arccos(4/\sqrt{41})<br /> According to my calculator, that is about 0.318.
 
Using sin(x)=\sqrt{1-cox^2(x)} I arrived also at a second answer, x=1.0315.
 
I'm not sure your static problem would lead to that equation. Sum of forces in x direction equal 0 and likewise in y. Your equation implies adding an x component and a y component. Once again I don't know what the problem is so I could be wrong.
 
waht said:
I'm not sure your static problem would lead to that equation. Sum of forces in x direction equal 0 and likewise in y. Your equation implies adding an x component and a y component. Once again I don't know what the problem is so I could be wrong.

Huh, I think he is adding moments of forces.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
207
Views
12K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top