Solve Algebra: 16+(y-6)^2=9+(y-5)^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter DB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the equation √(16 + (y-6)²) = √(9 + (y-5)²) and the misunderstanding regarding the square roots. Participants clarify that when squaring both sides, the square roots are eliminated, leading to the equation 16 + (y-6)² = 9 + (y-5)². There is an emphasis on the importance of understanding that √(a) = √(b) implies a = b, which is crucial for solving the equation correctly. The conversation highlights that the expression does not simplify directly to 16 + (y-6)² without the square root being squared first. Overall, the thread addresses common misconceptions in algebraic manipulation involving square roots.
DB
Messages
501
Reaction score
0
When

\sqrt{16 + (y-6)^2}=\sqrt{9+(y-5)^2}

is simplified to:

16+(y-6)^2=9+(y-5)^2

How come the 16 and 9 arent square rooted?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you agree that \sqrt{a} = \sqrt{b} implies a = b?

If so, what happens when you set a = 16 + (y - 6)^2 and b = 9 + (y - 5)^2?
 
ahhh, o you its because they are equal, i got mixed up thanks.
But \sqrt{16 + (y-6)^2}
doesn't simplify to 16+(y-6)^2 right?
 
Correct. It would have if the expression was \sqrt{ (16 + (y - 6)^2)^2 } though ;)
 
ya thanks muzza
 
If you square both sides of the equation,
\sqrt{16- (y-6)^2}= \sqrt{9- (y-5)^2}
you eliminate the two square roots and you get
16- (y-6)2= 9- (y-5)2.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top