Solve Angular Velocity: \theta=60deg, \alpha=-2w^2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating angular velocity given angular acceleration and position. The angular acceleration is defined as α = -2ω², and the problem involves finding the angular velocity at θ = 60 degrees, starting from θ = 30 degrees with an initial velocity of 10 rad/s. After some calculations, it was determined that the correct limits for integration should be from π/6 to π/3, leading to the conclusion that the angular velocity at θ = 60 degrees is approximately 3.51 rad/s. The initial miscalculation of 1.14 rad/s was corrected through proper integration and application of logarithmic properties. The final confirmation of the correct answer was achieved with the help of the forum participants.
Bingo1915
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Angular Velocity

1.
The angular acceleration is given \alpha=-2w^2 rad/s^2 where \omega is the angular velocity in rad/s. When \theta=30 deg the angular velocity is 10 rad/s. What is the angular velocity when \theta=60deg?


2.
Used \alpha=d\varpi/d\theta * \varpi


3.
\int-2 d\theta=\int1/\varpi d\varpi

after integration I got

[\(-2)*theta]=[ln\varpi]

limits 0-60 for \theta and 10 to \varpifor \varpi

I think I'm missing a step somewhere. The book gives an answer of w=3.51. With my calculations I get w=1.14. Can you advise?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Redo the calculation. Book is correct. The limits of theta should be from pi/6 to pi/3.
 
Using pi/6 to pi/3 I get

-2pi/3 + pi/3 = lnw-ln10

-pi/3 + ln10 = lnw

From here I think it is

1/[e^(-pi/3+ln10)] = w

Can you check me on this part?
 
Last edited:
1/[e^(-pi/3+ln10)] = w

e^(-pi/3+ln10) = w [ln a = b ie e^b = a]
 
Bingo1915 said:
Using pi/6 to pi/3 I get

-2pi/3 + pi/3 = lnw-ln10

-pi/3 + ln10 = lnw

ln 10/w = pi/3. Take antilog of pi/3, use a calulator (or something) => w = 3.51.

(By antilog, I meant, 10/w = e^pi/3. You have done everything correctly.)
 
Last edited:
I see where I was incorrect.

Thanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top