Solve complex exponential equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the complex exponential equation $$ B = A_1 e^{-\lambda_1 t} + A_2 e^{-\lambda_2 t} $$ for the variable t. Participants highlight that an analytical solution is often unattainable for such equations, necessitating the use of numerical methods. Specifically, the Newton's method is recommended as an effective root-finding algorithm to approximate the value of t iteratively. The discussion concludes with the user successfully applying the Newton method to solve their problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with root-finding algorithms, specifically Newton's method
  • Basic knowledge of numerical analysis techniques
  • Proficiency in logarithmic functions and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implementation of Newton's method in numerical analysis
  • Explore other root-finding algorithms such as the Bisection method and Secant method
  • Learn about the convergence criteria for numerical methods
  • Investigate the application of numerical routines in solving differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and students involved in numerical analysis, particularly those dealing with complex exponential equations and seeking practical solutions through iterative methods.

Smed
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
I'm having some trouble solving for t in the following exponential equation.

$$ B = A_1 e^{-\lambda_1 t} + A_2 e^{-\lambda_2 t} $$

I can't divide out the leading coefficients A1 and A2 because they differ. I'm not really sure how to immediately take the natural logarithm of both sides since the rhs would just become,

$$ \ln({A_1 e^{-\lambda_1 t} + A_2 e^{-\lambda_2 t}}) $$

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Smed and welcome to the forums.

How much mathematics have you taken?

Usually for general problems, we don't often have an analytic solution, or the analytic solution is either unknown or too complicated.

In the above case we use what is known as root-finding algorithms like Newtons method to solve the root of an equation which would give you a value.

If you can't find an analytic version easily or at all, try and use a numerical routine to calculate a good enough approximation of t which should suit your purposes. The value of t won't give exactly 0, but it will be close enough depending on what you calculate and how accurate you want it to be.
 
Chiro,

I've taken enough mathematics that I probably should be familiar with root-finding algorithms, but I wasn't. I think part of my problem is that I'm not sure what makes the equation not have an analytical solution. It seemed that way after trying to solve it for a while, but I figured I was just missing some simple technique.

After reading up on the Newton method, I was able to solve the problem iteratively.

Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K