Solve Dipole Problem: Help with E_y = kqd/r^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the dipole problem by breaking down the electric field components. The user is struggling to derive the y-component of the electric field, E_y, in the form kqd/r^3 and is confused about a negative sign in their calculations. Participants suggest that the negative sign is a matter of convention and that the user can focus on magnitudes instead. They also clarify that when r is much greater than d, the term involving (d/2) can be neglected in the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the Pythagorean theorem and simplifying the equation for the electric field.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
!dipole!

Picture12.png


Okay. So I am trying to do this kind of the old fashioned way. I broke the E's down into x and y component and am adding them together component-wise.

I have found that the x components cancel out. Now I am trying to widdle down the form I have for the y components. As of now I have that:

E_y=k[\frac{-|q_1|-|q_2|}{[(d/2)^2+r^2]^{1/2}}*\frac{d/2}{[(d/2)^2+r^2]^{1/2}}


The text has it in the form: kqd/r^3 which I am having a hard time getting.

How do I get rid of the negative sign? AND how do I make use of the fact r>>d??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone??
 
q1 and q2 are equal.

In your first term you have the denominator to the 1/2. That shouldn't be there. Check your work.

I'm not sure what to say about the negative sign because I'm not sure how you came up with it.

If r>>d then you can ignore your (d/2)^2 term in the denominator because it will be negligible compared to r^2.
 
Last edited:
I got the negative sign when I drew the free body diagram of my test charge. Since q_o is +, both fields are in the negative y direction.

Or should I just be considering their magnitude of 2q in this case and forget which direction they point?

hage567 said:
q1 and q2 are equal.

In your first term you have the denominator to the 1/2. That shouldn't be there. Check your work.

It is to the 1/2 because it is the distance from each q to p c^2=b^2+a^2
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
I got the negative sign when I drew the free body diagram of my test charge. Since q_o is +, both fields are in the negative y direction.

OK, that's just a matter of convention then. You could have made it positive if you wanted.

Or should I just be considering their magnitude of 2q in this case and forget which direction they point?

Since the y components are in the same direction (and equal magnitude), you can just say that E = 2*Ey (where Ey is the y component from one of the charges).

It is to the 1/2 because it is the distance from each
The general equation is E = \frac{kq}{x^2} right?

So you found the length of the hypotenuse using Pythagorus, so x^2 = (\frac{d}{2})^2 + r^2

So there is no need to take the square root to get just x, since you need x^2 in your equation anyway. Does that make sense? Just the first term in your denominator is wrong, the second one is right.
 
hage567 said:
OK, that's just a matter of convention then. You could have made it positive if you wanted.



Since the y components are in the same direction (and equal magnitude), you can just say that E = 2*Ey (where Ey is the y component from one of the charges).


The general equation is E = \frac{kq}{x^2} right?

So you found the length of the hypotenuse using Pythagorus, so x^2 = (\frac{d}{2})^2 + r^2

So there is no need to take the square root to get just x, since you need x^2 in your equation anyway. Does that make sense? Just the first term in your denominator is wrong, the second one is right.

Oh crap-ass! I do crap like this all the time. . . Thanks hage!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top