I Solve Eigenstates Doubt: Prof. Leonard Susskind's Quantum Mechanics

Muthumanimaran
Messages
79
Reaction score
2
I am currently reading Prof.Leonard Susskind's Lecture on Quantum Mechanics. In the Chapter: Spin in the arbitrary directions, in the subdivision Eigenstates
In case $$\lambda=1$$
Prof states that measuring spin in arbitrary +n state gives me +1 as eigenvalue, what I don't understand is the next expression $$n_zα+n_−β=α$$
I have no idea how this expression comes here, please help me. The link to the lecture is given below:
http://www.lecture-notes.co.uk/suss...ments/lecture-4/spin-in-arbitrary-directions/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two equations for ##\alpha## and ##\beta## given by the eigenvalue equation. This is the one for ##\alpha##. The other is for ##\beta##.
 
I don't see any obvious mistakes (I've not followed everything thoroughly). All that Suskind in fact does is to diagonalize the matrix ##\vec{n} \cdot \vec{\sigma}##. Where's your specific problem?
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Paul Colby said:
There are two equations for ##\alpha## and ##\beta## given by the eigenvalue equation. This is the one for ##\alpha##. The other is for ##\beta##.
I don't how that's lead to the expression $$n_zα+n_−β=α$$
 
##\sigma_n## times the vector ##(\alpha,\beta)## gives the same vector multiplied by 1. The equation follows from the top row of the matrix.
 
  • Like
Likes Muthumanimaran
ok, thank you, now I understand how it comes. Initially I misunderstood the Lecture. Its pretty straightforward.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top