Solve EM Radiation Homework: Compute E & B with Monochromatic Point Source

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the electric field E(r) and magnetic field B(r) from a monochromatic point source of electromagnetic radiation with a power of 100W, assuming a large radius r to treat the wave as a plane wave. The assumption of a plane wave is questioned, particularly regarding its implications for the Poynting vector and energy calculations. Participants clarify the correct expressions for energy density and energy flux, noting a mistake in the initial formulation of energy density. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between E, B, and the Poynting vector in the context of electromagnetic waves. Accurate calculations are crucial for solving the homework problem effectively.
qoqosz
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are given monochromatic point source of EM radiation which power is P=100W. The task is to compute E(r) and B(r). We can assume that r is large enough to treat wave as a plane wave.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First of all - what for do we assume that for big r it is plane wave?
My solution to this task is:

In a sphere of radius r and thickness dr there is an amount of energy W: W = P dt = \frac{1}{\epsilon \mu} EB 4 \pi r^2 dr
Then P = \frac{1}{\epsilon \mu} EB 4 \pi r^2 c \iff EB = \ldots and so on... I can easily calculate values of E and B but still - what for is the mentioned assumption?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, why is there a factor of 1/\epsilon in your expression? Do the units make sense?

If the fields aren't those of a plane wave, then the Poynting vector \textbf{S}=\frac{1}{\mu_0}\textbf{E}\times\textbf{B} does not necessarily point in the radial direction and have magnitude EB. The fields themselves could also depend on the polar and azimuthal angles,

\implies P(r)=\oint\textbf{S}\cdot d\textbf{a}=\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\textbf{S}\cdot\hat{\textbf{r}}r^2\sin\theta d\theta d\phi\neq\frac{4\pi r^2}{\mu_0}EB

in general.
 
Ok, thanks. I used \frac{1}{\mu \epsilon} EB as an energy density not an energy flux.
 
qoqosz said:
Ok, thanks. I used \frac{1}{\mu \epsilon} EB as an energy density not an energy flux.

But that doesn't even have units of energy density...
 
You're right - I made stupid mistake :( Should be: \frac{1}{\mu c} EB
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top