Solve Exploding Projectile Problem: Find Distance & Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smartguy94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
AI Thread Summary
A 12 kg shell is launched at a 64-degree angle with an initial speed of 120 m/s and explodes at its highest point into two fragments, one three times the mass of the other. The heavier fragment lands back at the launch point, while the lighter fragment's distance from the launch point is calculated using conservation of momentum and energy principles. The calculations reveal that the lighter fragment travels significantly further due to its increased velocity post-explosion. The energy released in the explosion can be determined by comparing the kinetic energy before and after the explosion, ultimately showing that the explosion adds substantial energy to the system. The correct approach involves understanding the momentum and energy dynamics of the fragments post-explosion.
Smartguy94
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 12 kg shell is launched at an angle of 64 degrees above the horizontal with an initial speed of 120 m/s. When it is at its highest point, the shell exploded into two fragments, one three times the mass of the other. The two fragments reach the ground at the same time. You can ignore air resistance. The heavier fragment lands back at the original launching point.
How far from the launch does the lighter fragment land?
How much energy is released in the explosion?


Homework Equations



p=mv
k=.5mv^2
x=vt
vf=vi+at

The Attempt at a Solution



V(horizontal)=52.604m/s
V(Vertical)=107.885m/s

KE(Vertical)= .5mv(vertical)= 69796.576
KE(Horizontal)= .5mv(horizontal)= 16603.424

KE(start) = PE(max height)
69796.576 = mgh
h = 593.5

vf=vi + at
t=11.006

x = vt
x = 578.941

If b = mass of small piece
b + 3b = 12
b = 3
small mass = 3
big mass = 9

KE(Horizontal) = .5mv^2
16603.424=.5(3)v^2
v=105.21

x = vt
x = 1157.93

total x = 1157.93 + 578.941 = 1736.87m

annnd its wrong :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The horizontal component of the velocity of the larger mass is equal in magnitude to the horizontal component of the velocity of the entire shell at launch. Since neither of the two fragments has any vertical component of velocity and momentum is conserved you can figure out the horizontal component of the smaller fragment's velocity.
 
Smartguy94 said:

Homework Statement


A 12 kg shell is launched at an angle of 64 degrees above the horizontal with an initial speed of 120 m/s. When it is at its highest point, the shell exploded into two fragments, one three times the mass of the other. The two fragments reach the ground at the same time. You can ignore air resistance. The heavier fragment lands back at the original launching point.
How far from the launch does the lighter fragment land?
How much energy is released in the explosion?

Homework Equations



p=mv
k=.5mv^2
x=vt
vf=vi+at

The Attempt at a Solution



V(horizontal)=52.604m/s
V(Vertical)=107.885m/s

KE(Vertical)= .5mv(vertical)= 69796.576
KE(Horizontal)= .5mv(horizontal)= 16603.424

KE(start) = PE(max height)
69796.576 = mgh
h = 593.5

vf=vi + at
t=11.006

x = vt
x = 578.941

If b = mass of small piece
b + 3b = 12
b = 3
small mass = 3
big mass = 9

KE(Horizontal) = .5mv^2
16603.424=.5(3)v^2
v=105.21

x = vt
x = 1157.93

total x = 1157.93 + 578.941 = 1736.87m

annnd its wrong :confused:
The bits I highlighted in red could be the source of your error. For a projectile, the KE at the top is not zero, that is only for things fired vertically. The KE at the top is a minimum, but not zero. KE is not a vector, so does not have vertical and horizontal components. It is a scalar, so just has magnitude

The PE at maximum height will be the difference between the KE at the start and the KE at the top.

I have not really followed your calculations exactly, just the overlying assumtions you have made.

EDIT: Note; once you have the right answer, I will show you the overview method I would have used to get it.
 
JHamm said:
The horizontal component of the velocity of the larger mass is equal in magnitude to the horizontal component of the velocity of the entire shell at launch. Since neither of the two fragments has any vertical component of velocity and momentum is conserved you can figure out the horizontal component of the smaller fragment's velocity.

i think i got the same answer from what you are saying

you are saying that the larger mass, which is 9kg, have velocity of horizontal launch = 52.604

so since the conservation of momentum is

m1v1 + m2v2 = 0
9(52.604) +3v2 = 0
v2 = 157.812

then to get the distance

x = vt
x = 157.812 (11.006)
x = 1736.879m

and is wrong :confused:
 
Smartguy94 said:
i think i got the same answer from what you are saying

you are saying that the larger mass, which is 9kg, have velocity of horizontal launch = 52.604

so since the conservation of momentum is

m1v1 + m2v2 = 0
9(52.604) +3v2 = 0
v2 = 157.812

then to get the distance

x = vt
x = 157.812 (11.006)
x = 1736.879m

and is wrong :confused:

The larger mass was coming back!, so its velocity will be -52.604, and the other one will be going much faster.
 
PeterO said:
The bits I highlighted in red could be the source of your error. For a projectile, the KE at the top is not zero, that is only for things fired vertically. The KE at the top is a minimum, but not zero. KE is not a vector, so does not have vertical and horizontal components. It is a scalar, so just has magnitude

The PE at maximum height will be the difference between the KE at the start and the KE at the top.

I have not really followed your calculations exactly, just the overlying assumtions you have made.

EDIT: Note; once yu have the right answer, I will show you the overview method I would have used to get it.

second try

vf=vi + at
t=11.006

x = vit
x = 578.947

12 v(horizontal) = 3v(small) + 9v(large)
12 (52.60) = 3v(small) + 9(52.60)
v(small) = 52.6

x = vt
x = 578.9156

x total = 1157.8626

and wrong again... :confused:
 
PeterO said:
The larger mass was coming back!, so its velocity will be -52.604, and the other one will be going much faster.

m1v1 + m2v2 = 0
9(-52.604) +3v2 = 0
v2 = 157.812

x = vt
x = 157.812 (11.006)
x = 1736.879m

it was a typo for the first one but the result is the same
 
Smartguy94 said:
m1v1 + m2v2 = 0
9(-52.604) +3v2 = 0
v2 = 157.812

x = vt
x = 157.812 (11.006)
x = 1736.879m

Sorry, didn't notice your eroneous zero.

The momentum at the time of the explosion was not zero. the 12 kg mass was traveling at 52.504 m/s at the time!
 
PeterO said:
Sorry, didn't notice your eroneous zero.

The momentum at the time of the explosion was not zero. the 12 kg mass was traveling at 52.504 m/s at the time!

m1v1 + m2v2 = mv
9(-52.604) +3v2 = 12(52.604)
v2 = 368.228

x = vt
x = 368.228(11.006)
x = 4050.5m

still wrong hahaha
 
  • #10
Smartguy94 said:
m1v1 + m2v2 = mv
9(-52.604) +3v2 = 12(52.604)
v2 = 368.228

x = vt
x = 368.228(11.006)
x = 4050.5m

still wrong hahaha

Looks like you have worked out how far the 3 kg moved on after the explosion. It had already traveled quite a distance before the explosion so will presumably land further away that 4050.
 
  • #11
PeterO said:
Looks like you have worked out how far the 3 kg moved on after the explosion. It had already traveled quite a distance before the explosion so will presumably land further away that 4050.

oooh yeaaa i forgot to add it to the original x -__-

now how do i find the energy??

.5mv^2 + mgh??
.5(12)(52.604)^2 + 12(9.8)(578.947)
84687.25J

guess not
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Smartguy94 said:
oooh yeaaa i forgot to add it to the original x -__-

now how do i find the energy??

.5mv^2 + mgh??

The explosion took place at a specific height - so potential doesn't come into it - pure kinetic.

You know how fast the 12 kg was going before explosion 0.5 mv2 for that

You know how fast each of the pieces were going after explosion. 0.5 mv2 a couple more times.

Presumable the energy after is greater than the energy before → the energy from the explosion.
 
  • #13
PeterO said:
The explosion took place at a specific height - so potential doesn't come into it - pure kinetic.

You know how fast the 12 kg was going before explosion 0.5 mv2 for that

You know how fast each of the pieces were going after explosion. 0.5 mv2 a couple more times.

Presumable the energy after is greater than the energy before → the energy from the explosion.

you are the best man, thanks so much
 
  • #14
Smartguy94 said:
you are the best man, thanks so much

Fine: Now my method.

As you carefully calculated, this projectile takes 11 seconds to reach maximum height, covering a horizontal distance of 580m
[these are rounded off figures for explanation purposes]

In the explosion, the two parts [3/4 and 1/4 of the original] head off horizontally.

the large part lands back where the original launch took place, so came back at the same speed as it reached the point.
The velocity of that part changed by 2V [from V to -V] so the other mass, being 1/3 the mass will undergo a 6V change, reaching +7V.

In the 11 seconds taken to get back to the ground, the 9kg travel the 580m [back to where it started]
In the same time, the 3kg will travel 7 times as far [7 times as fast], so will finish a total of 8 times the original 580m → 4640m

Energy wise.

The 12 kg mass arrives at maximum height at speed V so has 1/2 x 12 x V2 of KE. [call that quantity X for the moment]

3/4 of that mass travels at the same speed after explosion, so has 3X/4 units of energy.

1/4 of that mass is traveling at 7 times that speed, so from a mass point of view will have 1/4 the enrgy, but from a speed point of view will have 49 times the energy, so a total of 49X/4.

total energy is thus 13X

Thus the explosion contributes 12X joules of energy

X = 0.5 x 12 x 52.62

You do the numbers - best done with the actual values with all their decimal places.

NOTE: that if you can keep this, what I call global, view of the situation you can keep focussed on what is happening.

I refer to it as living the problem to see the answer, and resorting to the calculator to get the second decimal place of the answer.

Good Luck
 
Back
Top