MHB Solve Exponential Fraction Equation for $α$ ($C$, $m$)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation for alpha in a binary matrix problem, where the total number of ones is fixed at C and the number of ones in each row follows an exponential pattern. The equation derived is $\frac{1-e^{(m+1)*\alpha}}{1-e^{\alpha}}= C + 1$, which can be transformed into a polynomial form. Exact solutions for alpha exist only when m+1 is less than or equal to 4, with the trivial solution of $\alpha = 0$ being available. For larger values of m, approximation methods are necessary to estimate alpha based on different values of C and m. The discussion concludes that while no closed-form solution exists for larger m, estimations can still be made.
Stijn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I want to create a binary matrix (${X}_{m*n}$) containing $C$ ones ($||X|| = C$). Additionally I want to have the number of elements of each row ($m$) to have an exponential form. This is: for each row the number elements needs to be equal to $e^{alpha * i}$ or in symbols: ||${X}_{i}$|| = $e^{alpha*i}$.

As the total number of ones is known ($C$), we can say that: $||X|| =\sum_{i=1}^{m}e^{alpha*i} = C$
Based on the function of the sum of geometric series ($\sum_{a=0}^{A-1} {b}^{a}=\d{1-{b}^{A}}{1-b}$) we can rewrite the equation as:

$\frac{1-e^{(m+1)*\alpha}}{1-e^{\alpha}}= C + 1$

Is there a way to solve alpha out of this function and write the equation as: $\alpha = f(C, m)$?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Stijn! Welcome to MHB! ;)

Let me restrict myself to your immediate question:
Stijn said:
$\frac{1-e^{(m+1)*\alpha}}{1-e^{\alpha}}= C + 1$

Is there a way to solve alpha out of this function and write the equation as: $\alpha = f(C, m)$?

We can rewrite it as:
$$x^{m+1} - (C+1)x + C = 0$$
where $x = e^\alpha$.
Such a polynomial only has closed form solutions when $m+1 \le 4$.
We do have the solution $x=1$ or $\alpha=0$ though, meaning we can reduce the polynomial by one degree, so we can solve it up to $m=4$.
Beyond that we need approximation algorithms.
 
Hi,

Thank you for your quick response. As I was suspecting, no exact solution exists (other than $\alpha = 0$). I am able to estimate the values for different m and C values.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
825
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K