Solve Final Speed of Ice Sliding Down Slope

  • Thread starter Thread starter hyemal.zephyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sliding Slope
AI Thread Summary
A block of ice with a mass of 2.0 kg slides down a 27° incline, and the goal is to calculate its final speed after sliding 0.90 m, neglecting friction. The initial attempt incorrectly calculated the force acting on the block using the perpendicular component of weight, leading to an incorrect final speed of 3.97 m/s. The correct approach involves using the parallel component of the weight, resulting in a final speed of 2.83 m/s. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately determining force components in physics problems. Understanding these components is crucial for solving similar problems correctly in the future.
hyemal.zephyr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of ice with mass 2.0 kg slides 0.90 m down an inclined plane that slopes downward at an angle of 27° below the horizontal. If the block of ice starts from rest, what is its final speed? Friction can be neglected.

m = 2.0 kg
s = 0.90 m
θ = 27°

Homework Equations



W = Fs
W = ΔKE
ΔKE = 0.5m(vf2 - vi2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the equations given, I began with the following:
Fs = 0.5m(vf2 - vi2)

Then, because the ice is on a slope, I calculated the force acting on the block:
F = mgcosθ
F = (2.0 kg)(9.81 m/s2)cos(27°)
F = 17.48 N

Plugging all of the variables into the equation, now:
(17.48 N)(0.90 m) = 0.5(2.0 kg)(vf2 - (0 m/s)2)
vf = 3.97 m/s

Apparently, though, this is incorrect. I'm not sure why.

As a side note, I know how to solve the problem using kinematics, but this topic is introducing work, so we have to solve the problem as such.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hyemal.zephyr said:
Then, because the ice is on a slope, I calculated the force acting on the block:
F = mgcosθ
That's the component of the weight perpendicular to the surface; you want the component parallel to the surface.
 
Yes, I got 2.83 m/s, which is apparently the correct answer. Thank you.

Though, why is that, exactly? It being the perpendicular component, that is. I've understood that as the parallel component and I've always seemed to do well with it.
 
hyemal.zephyr said:
Though, why is that, exactly? It being the perpendicular component, that is. I've understood that as the parallel component and I've always seemed to do well with it.
You need to review how to find components. See: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/vectors/u3l3e.cfm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, I see what I've been doing incorrectly. Hah, I feel like a moron now.

Thank you very much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top