Solve for charge(q), given radius, electric field, and density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the charge of an oil drop in Millikan's experiment using its radius, density, and the applied electric field. The user initially derived the charge using the formula q = (-4*pi*r^3*σ*g)/(3E) and calculated a value of -1.28 x 10^-18 C. After attempting to express this charge in terms of the elementary charge (e), the user mistakenly concluded it was -8e. Upon further review, it was clarified that the correct result was simply -8, indicating a misunderstanding in the conversion to elementary charge units. The final resolution emphasizes the importance of careful unit conversion and verification in physics calculations.
Lemon-Sam
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In Millikan's experiment, an oil drop of radius 1.73 μm and density 0.865 g/cm3 is suspended in chamber C when a downward electric field of 1.44 × 105 N/C is applied. Find the charge on the drop, in terms of e. (Tolerance of solution is +/- 2%)

Known:

radius, r = 1.73 μm x 10-6 m

density, σ = 0.865 x 103 kg/m3

Electric field, E = 1.44 × 105 N/C

magnitude of charge of electron, e = 1.6 x 10-19

gravitational constant, g = 9.8 m/s2

Homework Equations



1. Force due to electric field: F = -qE

2. Mass of the drop, m = (4pi/3)*r3

3. Force of gravity, F = mg = (4/3)*pi*r3*σ*g

The Attempt at a Solution



(1) I rearranged equations (1) & (3) from above to solve for q, thus:

q = (-4*pi*r3*σ*g)/3E

(2) I then plugged in the given values:

q = [-4*pi*(1.73 x 10-6m)3*0.865 x 103 kg/m3*9.8 m/s2]/(3*1.44 x 105 N/C)

= -1.28 x 10-18 C

(3) Now, to put the solution in terms of e, I divided my result from (2) by the magnitude of charge of electron, e:

q = (-1.28 x 10-18 C/1.6 x 10-19 C)(1e)

= -8e C

However, my answer is incorrect, and I'm not sure why. I also tried to reverse the sign of my solution, but that was incorrect as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
using the data I am getting

q=-3.83\times 10^{-18}\;\mathrm{C}

check math
 
I checked the math again, and it turns out that the correct result was just -8, instead of -8e. Thank you for your reply, Issac.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top