Solve for Initial Speed: Dropping Chestnuts from a Tree

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial speed required for a second chestnut dropped from a tree to reach the ground simultaneously with the first chestnut. The first chestnut falls 2.5 meters before the second is thrown down, and the acceleration due to gravity is -9.81 m/s². The user initially attempted to find the velocity of the first chestnut after falling 2.5 meters and then set up equations to find the time for both chestnuts to hit the ground. After some confusion, they correctly determined the time it takes for the first chestnut to fall the remaining distance and used that to calculate the required initial speed for the second chestnut, arriving at -9.1 m/s. The approach, while initially complicated, was validated by other participants who confirmed the method was sound.
unigal13
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



While sitting on a tree branch 10.0 m above the ground, you drop a chesnut. When the chestnut has fallen 2.5 m, you throw a second one straight down. What initial speed must you give the 2nd chestnut if they are both to reach the ground at the same time?

Other variables given: a = -9.81 m/s^2

Homework Equations



Constant acceleration equations of motion:
(all of the (f)'s and (i)'s indicate just final and initial - not multipliers)

Formula 1: v(f)^2 = v(i)^2 + 2(a)[x(f) - x(i)]

Formula 2: x(f) = x(i) + v(f)(t) + (1/2)(a)(t)^2

and maybe: x(f) = x(i) + (1/2)[v(i) + v(f)]t

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I would find the velocity of the C1 (first chestnut) after falling 2.5 m, and then designate it v(i). Then I would make the two times equal to each other and in turn manipulate to find the required v(i) of C2.

Here is how I found the velocity of C1 after falling 2.5 m:

Using formula 1:
v(f)^2 = 2(-9.81)[7.5-10]
v(f) = -7.0 m/s

Now I have the following variables for the second part:

C1:
v(i) = -7.0 m/s
x(i) = 7.5 m
x(f) = 0 m

C2:
v(i) = ??
x(i) = 10 m
x(f) = 0 m

So, I decided to use Formula 2, manipulate to solve for time for each, and then set each equation equal to each other. However, it looks quite messy with the quadratic equations and such, so I'm guessing my approach must be wrong.
Maybe I should use the other equation I mentioned above instead? But then it would require a final velocity... I'm stumped!

Please help me out... it would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Welcome to PF.

You know the time C1 takes to fall the 7.5 m height ( time taken to fall 10m minus time taken to fall 2.5m). In this time, C2 falls 10m. Now which formula do you think you should use?
 


Thank you for your reply!

I think I was making things a bit too complicated.

Would it work if I found the velocity of C1 after falling 2.5 m (I got -7.0 m/s, like I showed above), then found the time it took C1 to fall from 7.5 m to 0 m, using Formula 2:

Formula 2: 0 = 7.5 + (-7.0)(t) + (1/2)(-9.81)(t)^2
When using the quadratic formula, I found time to equal 0.714 s.

Then, I subbed this time into Formula 2 again, this time to find the initial velocity for C2:

Formula 2: 0 = 10 + v(i)(0.714) + (1/2)(-9.81)(0.714)^2
I then found the velocity to be -9.1 m/s.

So is that final answer of -9.1 m/s correct?

Thank you very much to whoever replies!
 


unigal13 said:
Would it work if I found the velocity of C1 after falling 2.5 m (I got -7.0 m/s, like I showed above), then found the time it took C1 to fall from 7.5 m to 0 m, using Formula 2:

You do not have to explicitly find the speed of C1 after it has fallen 2.5m. You just need to find the time C1 takes to fall 7.5m, as I have pointed out. Nevertheless, your method is OK. I have not checked the calculations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top