Solve for vectors needed to cancel out given sets of forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for the direction of vector D needed to cancel out given sets of forces. The user has correctly calculated the x and y components of vector D, which place it in the fourth quadrant. However, confusion arises regarding the angle, as the user initially calculated it to be 253 degrees, suggesting quadrant three. Clarification indicates that the angle should be derived from the inverse tangent, resulting in a negative angle that, when adjusted, should be close to 360 degrees. The consensus is that the calculations for the components are correct, but the angle needs to be recalibrated to reflect its true position in the fourth quadrant.
aron silvester

Homework Statement


For this assignment, I am given sets of forces and asked to solve for the force(s) needed to cancel them out. For this case, I am asked to solve for the last vector, which is vector D. I've successfully found its x and y component, magnitude, and mass (kg). I've also checked if all of their combined x and y components added up to zero by adding the x and y components for all vectors A, B, C, and D. What I don't understand is the answer I got for the direction of vector D. When I drew a diagram for vector D, it's located in quadrant 4, since x-component is 1.23 N, and y-component is -0.37 N. The direction I got was 253 degrees, clearly, it means that the vectors should be in quadrant 3, but according to my x and y component, it's pointing in quadrant 4. Did I make a mistake when calculating the direction of vector D?

Homework Equations


It's all in my work down below in part 3.

The Attempt at a Solution


Case 5.jpeg


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your math looks good to me as far as the components go. I would double check your angle however. From the two components, it should be a small negative angle that is close to 360 degrees rather than 270 degrees. Definitely in the fourth quadrant.
 
magoo said:
Your math looks good to me as far as the components go. I would double check your angle however. From the two components, it should be a small negative angle that is close to 360 degrees rather than 270 degrees. Definitely in the fourth quadrant.
Isn't that how to find the angle by using the inverse of tangent, and we add 270 degrees because it's in the 4th quadrant?
 
The inverse tangent will give you the angle of -16.8 degrees. Because it's in the fourth quadrant, you need to subtract it from 360 degrees. I'm not sure where you got the equation that adds it to 270 degrees.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top