Solve for x: 0 < x < 2(pie) sin(x)+2sin(x)cos(x)=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter seanistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation sin(x) + 2sin(x)cos(x) = 0 within the interval 0 < x < 2π. Participants clarify that the equation can be factored as sin(x)(1 + 2cos(x)) = 0, allowing for the identification of roots by setting each factor to zero. There is confusion regarding the distribution of terms, but it is confirmed that sin(x) + 2sin(x)cos(x) is equivalent to sin(x)(1 + 2cos(x)). The importance of understanding trigonometric identities and the commutative property of multiplication is emphasized. Overall, the conversation highlights the process of simplifying and solving trigonometric equations.
seanistic
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
solve for x, if 0< x < 2(pie)

sin(x)+2sin(x)cos(x)=0

Correct me if I am wrong but you can only solve this if the equation consists of all sin(x) or all cos(x). I realize that 2sinAcosA = sin2A but I am in section 1 which is "simple trigonometric equations" and section 2 is "using identities in trigonometric equations" so I don't see why they would put a problem that uses identities in sections 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you need to use identities? Use the distributive law; in other words, pull the sin(x) out.
 
well I thought about that and I came up with sinx(1+2cosx) which I don't think is right because then I would get sinx+2cosxsinx.
 
when you have sinx(1+2cosx)=0 all you have to do is find the roots of the equation when sinx=0 and 1+2cosx=0
 
I understand the part about finding the roots but I am confused that sinx+2sinxcosx = sinx(1+2cosx) because when I distribute i get sinx+2cosxsinx. is sinx+2cosxsinx the same as sinx+2sinxcosx?also I thought in order to solve for x you had to have the same trig function. Right now the equation would be equivilant to x+2xy=0 trying to solve for x. that's why I thought you had to have the indentity in order to have only one variable.

I know I am slow at this but in my defense I am teaching myself out of "Trigonometry - 5th edition by Charles P. Mckeague and Mark D. Turner".
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is, since real number (and real function) multiplication is a commutative operation.
 
seanistic said:
is sinx+2cosxsinx the same as sinx+2sinxcosx?

Of course it is!

sin(x)(2+cos(x)) = 0
=> sin(x) = 0, cos(x) +0.5 = 0
 
yes sinx+2sinxcosx = sinx+2cosxsinx as long as you have the 2, cosx, and sinx being multiplied, it doesn't matter in what order you have them being multiplied, ex. sinx*cosx*2 = 2*cosx*sinx = cosx*2*sinx = ...
 
ok, that makes sense now. I was under the impression that the 2 stayed with its function, perhaps I was thinking of cos2x or sin2x?
 
  • #10
probably, that's why soemtiems it helps to write sinx,cosx out as sin(x), cos(x)
 
Back
Top