Solve for x: Logarithmic Equation with Multiple Terms - Step by Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikita33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves solving a logarithmic equation that combines multiple logarithmic terms. The original poster presents an equation involving logarithms of variables and constants, expressing uncertainty about the correct approach to simplify and solve for the variable x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the logarithmic terms by applying properties of logarithms, specifically questioning the addition and multiplication of logs. Some participants clarify the correct application of logarithmic properties and suggest alternative forms for the expressions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the manipulation of logarithmic expressions. There is a focus on correcting misunderstandings about logarithmic identities and exploring different representations of the terms involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the setup and interpretation of logarithmic properties, indicating a need for clearer understanding of logarithmic rules. The original poster also notes a previous incorrect submission on an exam, which adds to the context of their inquiry.

nikita33
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



log x2 + log x - log 2.7 = log 10
solve for x

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


this one i really don't know how to do. I can't find any examples, but this is what i tried (youre going to be like, what? but i had to attempt it.) I think when logs are in addition format, youre supposed to multiply them? does that make sense? i really need help on this one. :

2 log x + log x = log 10 + log 2.7
2 log x2 = log 27
4 log x = log 27

thats as far as i can get. i know its wrong. even one step in the right direction would help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, 2*log(x)+log(x) IS NOT 2*log(x^2). 2*log(x)+log(x)=3*log(x)=log(27). Try it from there. Or do log(x^2)+log(x)=log(x^3)=log(27).
 
Last edited:
^
i had it that way the first time. i think i changed it because i got

3 log x = log 27
then to solve for x i got something that looks like this:

x = log 27/3 log

3 log? is it supposed to be 3 log 1?

if so, the answer is 0. i put 0 on my exam, although i set it up incorrectly. my prof would give a point for the correct answer and i got no points, so i don't think that's the answer.
 
"3 log" makes no sense. Go back a step to 3 log x = log 27.

What's another way to write 3 log x?
 
3*log(x)=log(x^3), doesn't it? 3log(x) is not 3*log*x. That's just plain silly, as Mark44 points out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
6K