Solve for x: Logarithmic Equation with Multiple Terms - Step by Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikita33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the logarithmic equation log x^2 + log x - log 2.7 = log 10. Participants clarify that when adding logarithms, the correct approach is to combine them into a single logarithm using multiplication, leading to log(x^3) = log(27). The confusion arises from misapplying logarithmic properties, particularly in manipulating the terms. Ultimately, the correct interpretation simplifies the equation to find x, emphasizing the need to correctly apply logarithmic rules. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding logarithmic identities for solving such equations effectively.
nikita33
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



log x2 + log x - log 2.7 = log 10
solve for x

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


this one i really don't know how to do. I can't find any examples, but this is what i tried (youre going to be like, what? but i had to attempt it.) I think when logs are in addition format, youre supposed to multiply them? does that make sense? i really need help on this one. :

2 log x + log x = log 10 + log 2.7
2 log x2 = log 27
4 log x = log 27

thats as far as i can get. i know its wrong. even one step in the right direction would help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, 2*log(x)+log(x) IS NOT 2*log(x^2). 2*log(x)+log(x)=3*log(x)=log(27). Try it from there. Or do log(x^2)+log(x)=log(x^3)=log(27).
 
Last edited:
^
i had it that way the first time. i think i changed it because i got

3 log x = log 27
then to solve for x i got something that looks like this:

x = log 27/3 log

3 log? is it supposed to be 3 log 1?

if so, the answer is 0. i put 0 on my exam, although i set it up incorrectly. my prof would give a point for the correct answer and i got no points, so i don't think that's the answer.
 
"3 log" makes no sense. Go back a step to 3 log x = log 27.

What's another way to write 3 log x?
 
3*log(x)=log(x^3), doesn't it? 3log(x) is not 3*log*x. That's just plain silly, as Mark44 points out.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top