Solve Galvanic Cell: 0.050M Cu2+, AlCl3 0.0118M

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a galvanic cell problem involving copper(II) sulfate and aluminum chloride. The Nernst equation is formulated, with the standard cell potential calculated as 2.0462 V. To achieve a log term of zero in the Nernst equation, the concentration of Al3+ is determined to be 0.0118 M. Concerns are raised about using an aluminum electrode in water due to its reactivity and oxide layer, which complicates accurate potential calculations. Overall, the calculations appear correct, but practical considerations regarding the aluminum electrode's behavior in the solution are highlighted.
reising1
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a Galvanic Cell composed of one half-cell containing 0.050 M copper(II) sulfate with a copper electrode and another half-cell containing an unknown concentration of aluminum chloride, AlCl3, and an aluminum electrode.

a. Write the Nernst equation for this galvanic cell, replacing as many variables as possible with numbers.
b. What concentration of AlCl3 would be necessary for the log term in the Nernst equation to equal zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



a. 2Al + 3Cu2+ -> 2Al3+ + 3Cu
Delta E standard = E(cathode) - E(anode) = .3402 - -1.706 = 2.0462

Delta E = E standard - .05917 / n (log Q)
Delta E = 2.0462 - (.05915/6) log( (Al3+)^2 / (Cu2+)^3 )

b. log( (Al3+)^2 / (Cu2+)^3 ) = 0
(Al3+)^2 / (Cu2+)^3 = 1
(Al3+)^2 / (.05)^3 = 1
Al3+ = .0118 M

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK at first sight, but I can be missing something.

I don't like the idea of Al electrode in water. Al is reactive enough to displace hydrogen from water, plus it is always covered with oxide, so calculating electrode potential as if it was any other metal is a waste of time and has nothing to do with reality.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top