Solve Geodesic Problem: Show ku^β = u^α∇αu^β

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesic
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm working my way through Wald's GR book and doing this geodesic problem:

Show that any curve whose tangent satisfies u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = k u^\beta, where k is a constant, can be reparameterized so that \tilde{u}^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta = 0.

Homework Equations



Geodesic equation

The Attempt at a Solution



If we assume that the curve was originally parameterized so that u = d/d\lambda and we reparameterize so that \tilde{u} = d/dt with t = t(\lambda) then it follows immediately that u^\alpha = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\alpha.

So then u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\beta \right). Now I know I need to expand this out into two terms, and I was thinking I could use the product rule to do that, but I'm a bit confused about how to do that. It seems I'd get
u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\beta \right) = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta + u^\alpha \tilde{u^\beta} \nabla_\alpha \frac{dt}{d\lambda}
The first term I can relate to my definition u^\alpha = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\alpha to get \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\right)^2 \tilde{u}^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta, and I know I'm supposed to relate this and the other term to the other side of the geodesic equation (with the constant k) to get a differential equation to solve for t(lambda). But I'm confused about how to get there from here, mostly from term \nabla_\alpha \frac{dt}{d\lambda}. I don't understand what it means mathematically (isn't dt/dlambda a scalar?), let alone how to do anything with it. Can anyone explain how to take the next step? Or was my "product rule" guess total nonsense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
transform all vectors and remember that the covariant derivative becomes a partial derivative for scalars
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top