Solve Inferometer Problem: URGENT

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreatEscapist
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a complex problem involving a Mach-Zehnder interferometer used in optical computing. The user is struggling to determine the first index of refraction of an electro-optic crystal that changes the optical switch's state, given that the initial index is 1.564. They express confusion about how to calculate the path length difference and apply the relevant equations for constructive and destructive interference. A hint from the professor suggests focusing on the path length difference, particularly how the crystal's refractive index affects the wavelength of light traveling through it. The user seeks clarification on missing information, such as the thickness of the crystal and the specific states referenced in the problem.
GreatEscapist
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
Inferometer problem: URGENT

After trying to do this problem all night the night before it was due, and no avail on just scouring the internet, I would really appreciate some quick help if anyone is still up. (Or early in the morning)

Homework Statement


Optical computers require microscopic optical switches to turn signals on and off. One device for doing so, which can be implemented in an integrated circuit, is the Mach-Zender interferometer seen in the figure(Figure 1) on the next page. Light from an on-chip infrared laser ( wavelength = 1.080 nm) is split into two waves that travel equal distances around the arms of the interferometer. One arm passes through an electro-optic crystal, a transparent material that can change its index of refraction in response to an applied voltage. Suppose both arms are exactly the same length and the crystal's index of refraction with no applied voltage is also 1.564.


What is the first index of refraction of the electro-optic crystal larger than 1.564 that changes the optical switch to the state opposite the state you found in part a?

Homework Equations


I don't know- my teacher barely covered this, and not very well. This problem is not like any of the others in the book.

(2*pi*Δx)/λ = 2*pi*m for constructive, where Δx is the path length difference
(2*pi*Δx)/λ = 2*pi*(m+.5) for destructive, where Δx is the path length difference
λ/n = λ_n

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that it comes out dimly (from a previous problem). I want to then make this constructive, however, I am completely and utterly stumped at how to do that. A hint given to my class by my professor on the school forum was:

I started to set up a similar problem today in class - what you want to do is look at the path length difference - including the fact that some of the path is inside the material so you have to shift the wavelength to lambda/n (where n is the index of refraction). You're told that the paths are the same distance, so the only difference is the length it goes in the plastic - so you're comparing light that doesn't go through plastic to light that goes through plastic: x/lambda compared to x/(lambda/n) where x is the distance traveled that is different for the two rays (one in plastic and one not in plastic)


So we know that it only goes through the plastic...but how do I compare? I'm so lost...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There appears to be information missing. The diagram. What is the thickness of the electro-optic crystal? What is "the state you found in part a"? What is the switch and what makes it change states?
 


The crystal changes the path length to xn, where x is the length of the arms, so the path difference between the two arms is
xn - x = x(n-1) so this needs to be an integral number of wavelengths for constructive interference (assuming no phase change).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top