Solve Isosceles Triangle in Coordinate System

AI Thread Summary
In a coordinate system limited to the first quadrant, the problem involves determining the integer-coordinate points R that can form an isosceles triangle with points P(3,3) and Q(4,4). Initially, one participant counted six possible points, but further discussion revealed that the perpendicular bisector of PQ provides an infinite number of solutions. The requirement for integer coordinates refines the solution to specific points along the line x+y=7. Ultimately, the discussion concluded with the identification of eight valid points, including (4,3) and (3,4). The challenge lies in balancing the integer constraints with the geometric properties of the triangle.
thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I will to explain this without a diagram. Consider a coordinate system(1st quadrant) where the x and y-axis both stop at 7 units (i mean the boundary), there are two points P(3,3) and Q(4,4). How many points can R be positioned such that PQR is an isosceles triangle.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I got 6.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I had quite a few and started counting them... Eventually I counted up to infinite different possible points :-p

There are actually 3 paths the point R can trace, a line and 2 circles. See if you can find them.
 
thereddevils said:

Homework Statement



I will to explain this without a diagram. Consider a coordinate system(1st quadrant) where the x and y-axis both stop at 7 units (i mean the boundary), there are two points P(3,3) and Q(4,4). How many points can R be positioned such that PQR is an isosceles triangle.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I got 6.
Then you haven't given all the information. Are you talking about a "mesh" where the points must have integer components? As you give it, any point on the perpendicular bisector of PQ works and there are an infinite number of them.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Then you haven't given all the information. Are you talking about a "mesh" where the points must have integer components? As you give it, any point on the perpendicular bisector of PQ works and there are an infinite number of them.

yeah sorry, it must be of integer components where you can precisely represent that particular point on the plane.

My 6 points are

(5,2) , (2,5) , (6,1) , (1,6) , (7,0) , (0,7)
 
thereddevils said:
must be of integer components where you can precisely represent that particular point on the plane.

Yet the distance between P and Q is not an integer.
Anyway, this means we have the two equations

\sqrt{(x-4)^2+(y-4)^2}=n

\sqrt{(x-3)^2+(y-3)^2}=n

where n is an integer, to solve simultaneously.
After simplifying, we find the perpendicular bisector of PQ to be the line x+y-7=0
Now just use all possible integer values of x and y such that x+y=7.

I don't know if I should scrap the idea of the point R can trace that are circles rather than this line, because that means we have to use a non-integer value for another length.
 
Mentallic said:
Yet the distance between P and Q is not an integer.
Anyway, this means we have the two equations

\sqrt{(x-4)^2+(y-4)^2}=n

\sqrt{(x-3)^2+(y-3)^2}=n

where n is an integer, to solve simultaneously.
After simplifying, we find the perpendicular bisector of PQ to be the line x+y-7=0
Now just use all possible integer values of x and y such that x+y=7.

I don't know if I should scrap the idea of the point R can trace that are circles rather than this line, because that means we have to use a non-integer value for another length.

sigh.. 8 points then including (4,3) , (3,4)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top