Solve ##\left| x+3 \right|= \left| 2x+1\right|##

  • Thread starter Thread starter RChristenk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    algebra-precalculus
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation ##\left| x+3 \right|= \left| 2x+1\right|## can be solved by considering two cases: ##x+3=2x+1## and ##x+3=-(2x+1)##. The first case simplifies directly to ##x=2##. The second case leads to the necessity of accounting for both positive and negative scenarios when removing absolute values, ultimately confirming that both cases yield valid solutions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing that absolute values can yield multiple solutions, specifically two distinct solutions in this case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of absolute value equations
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation
  • Knowledge of solving linear equations
  • Basic concepts of quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to solve quadratic equations derived from absolute value equations
  • Study the properties of absolute values in mathematical expressions
  • Explore the implications of piecewise functions in absolute value scenarios
  • Investigate advanced techniques for solving equations involving multiple absolute values
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, educators teaching absolute value concepts, and anyone seeking to enhance their problem-solving skills in mathematics.

RChristenk
Messages
73
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Solve ##\left| x+3 \right|= \left| 2x+1\right|##
Relevant Equations
Absolute values
Both sides are in absolute values, i.e. positive, so the solution is straightforward: ##\left| x+3 \right|= \left| 2x+1\right| \Rightarrow x+3=2x+1 \Rightarrow x=2##.

But the solution presents another case: ##x+3 = -(2x+1)##. How is this possible if both sides are in absolute values, i.e. positive?

I understand ##\left| x\right|= \pm c##, but when there are absolute values on both sides, I don't understand why you can remove the absolute values by setting one side to negative. Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##|x| = |y|## then there are four possible solutions:
$$x = y$$or$$x = -y$$or$$-x = y$$or$$-x = -y$$This, however, simplifies to two solutions.
$$x = y$$or$$x = -y$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala, scottdave, Math100 and 3 others
RChristenk said:
Homework Statement: Solve ##\left| x+3 \right|= \left| 2x+1\right|##
Relevant Equations: Absolute values

Both sides are in absolute values, i.e. positive, so the solution is straightforward: ##\left| x+3 \right|= \left| 2x+1\right| \Rightarrow x+3=2x+1 \Rightarrow x=2##.

But the solution presents another case: ##x+3 = -(2x+1)##. How is this possible if both sides are in absolute values, i.e. positive?

If you were asked to solve |x| = |3|, would you exclude x = -3 as a solution?

Here, is there any reason to exlude the case -3 < x < -\frac12, where x + 3 > 0 but 2x + 1 < 0?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala, RChristenk and PeroK
When you remove the absolute values, you do not know if the inside is positive or negative and you have to account for either possibility.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and Gavran
RChristenk said:
I understand ##\left| x\right|= \pm c##, but when there are absolute values on both sides, I don't understand why you can remove the absolute values by setting one side to negative. Thanks for the help.
## |x| = c \Rightarrow x = \pm c ## where ## c \ge 0 ##. By using this, there will be ## |x+3| = |2x+1| \Rightarrow x+3 = \pm |2x+1| ## and finally ## x+3 = \pm (2x+1) ## because ## \pm |2x+1| ## can be rewritten as ## \pm (2x+1) ##.
 
What about squaring both sides and solving the resulting quadratic equation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
Gavran said:
## |x| = c \Rightarrow x = \pm c ## where ## c \ge 0 ##. By using this, there will be ## |x+3| = |2x+1| \Rightarrow x+3 = \pm |2x+1| ## and finally ## x+3 = \pm (2x+1) ## because ## \pm |2x+1| ## can be rewritten as ## \pm (2x+1) ##.
You can skip a step in the above. ## |x+3| = |2x+1| \Rightarrow x+3 = \pm (2x+1) ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala, Math100 and PeroK
Mark44 said:
You can skip a step in the above. ## |x+3| = |2x+1| \Rightarrow x+3 = \pm (2x+1) ##
Repitition of post ##2##. Cheers @Mark44
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K