If we remember the definition of Euler's number, we have:
$$e \equiv \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left(1 +\frac{1}{n}\right)^n$$
So, as we can see, this is a sequence, which has members that are all bigger than one, yet they are tending towards ##1^\infty## type of limit. This limit is generally undefined, in a sense that you have to inspect it more clearly. For example, if we have a sequence which has a limit ##1^\infty##, then logarithm of that sequence would have limit ##0 \times \infty##. Your limit is ##\infty^0## which would also turn into a ##0 \times \infty## type of limit if you take logarithm of the sequence. Now you might say, this should be zero, right? But the deal with the limits is that it's not exactly zero, it is something that is tending towards zero, multiplied by something that is increasing without bound. So the question of what the product should be, depends on how fast this one term is converging to zero, and how fast the other term is diverging. Imagine you have something that diverges exponentially, multiplied by something that linearly converges to zero, for example a sequence defined by ##a_n = 2^n \times \frac{1}{n}##. If you try writing it term by term, you will see that it diverges. But then look at ##a_n = n \times e^{-n}##. This one tends to zero. And both of those are of form ##0 \times \infty##.
So the point of the story is that ##1^\infty## is not equal to ##1##(same goes for ##\infty^0##), it must be investigated further. In fact, as we can see, we defined Euler's number ##e## to be a limit of sequence of that form. Which gives you the hint about your exercise. For example, you probably find a limit ##0 \times \infty## easier to deal with than this limit, so maybe there is a way to take the logarithm of this? Hope that helps.