Solve Logarithm Problem: Prove 3/2

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
I am not very good in logs i have tried to attempt below problem in vain..give me an insight.
Prove Log(√27 + Log √8 - Log √125 ) / (Log 6 – Log 5) =3/2
I am not good in logarithms how do you show this…
This is how I did it:,
Log ( ( 3√3 *2√2 ) / 5√5 ) ) / ( 6/5)

((3√(3 *) 2√2 *5)) / ((5√5 *6)) = 6/5 and not 3/2 as indicated by problem am i right?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is it log10 or the natural logarithm?

Are you sure the problem is correctly written in your post. If you include more parentheses it would be somewhat clearer.

You are expected to use:

log(ab) = log(a) + log(b)
log(a^b) = b log(a)

as well as some factorizing and shortening of fractions.

I checked the numerical value by typing it into Octave, but didn't get 3/2 or 6/5, not with log10 and not with the natural logarithm :-) I won't garantee that I did nothing wrong, though.
 
torquil said:
Is it log10 or the natural logarithm?

Are you sure the problem is correctly written in your post. If you include more parentheses it would be somewhat clearer.

You are expected to use:

log(ab) = log(a) + log(b)
log(a^b) = b log(a)

as well as some factorizing and shortening of fractions.

I checked the numerical value by typing it into Octave, but didn't get 3/2 or 6/5, not with log10 and not with the natural logarithm :-) I won't garantee that I did nothing wrong, though.

This is a logarithms used in every day calculations i.e of base 10 and they are reffered to as common logarithms and the base 10 is often omitted...kindly note that the question is to be solved without the help of tables or other...the solution to the problem is 3/2
kindly solve manually showing your steps i have shown mine...i am conversant with the laws of logarithms.
 
chwala said:
I am not very good in logs i have tried to attempt below problem in vain..give me an insight.
Prove Log(√27 + Log √8 - Log √125 ) / (Log 6 – Log 5) =3/2
I am not good in logarithms how do you show this…
This is how I did it:,
Log ( ( 3√3 *2√2 ) / 5√5 ) ) / log ( 6/5)


Fixed.

You're trying to solve \frac{\log\left(\frac{3\sqrt{3}\cdot 2\sqrt{2}}{5\sqrt{5}}\right)}{\log\left(\frac{6}{5}\right)}



chwala said:
((3√(3 *) 2√2 *5)) / ((5√5 *6)) = 6/5 and not 3/2 as indicated by problem am i right?

\frac{log(a)}{log(b)}\neq \frac{a}{b} so I'm not surprised it doesn't give you the answer you were looking for.

Look at the numerator, simplify the part inside the log, and then convert the roots into fractional powers to make things clearer :wink:

p.s. It doesn't matter what logarithm it is. The answer is independent of this.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
Log (3^3/2 * 2^3/2 / 5^3/2) = Log (6/5)

Log (3*2/5)^3/2 = Log (6/5)

Log (6/5)^3/2 = Log (6/5)
3/2 Log (6/5) = Log (6/5)
3/2 = log (6/5) / Log (6/5)
=3/2
I love physics forum thank you so much…….maths for life
thanks a lot mentallic.
 
No worries :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top