Solve Menelau's Theorem: Negative & Positive Lengths in a Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter disregardthat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Menelau's theorem states that for a transversal intersecting the sides of a triangle, the product of the ratios of the segments is equal to -1. The confusion arises from the distinction between positive and negative lengths, where segments internally dividing a line segment yield positive ratios, while externally dividing segments yield negative ratios. The proof highlights that AY is negative when considering direction, while BZ is positive, contributing to the overall product being -1. Understanding this distinction clarifies the theorem's application in various geometric scenarios. The discussion concludes with the realization that the sign of the ratios depends on whether the segments are divided internally or externally.
disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
[SOLVED] Menelau's theorem

"If a transversal is drawn to cut the sides of a triangle (produced if necessary), the product of the ratios of alternate segments is minus one.

So, for http://www.freewebs.com/jarle10/menelau's%20theorem.JPG (See picture)

\frac{BU}{UC} \cdot \frac{CY}{YA} \cdot \frac{AZ}{ZB} = -1"

I don't understand this. How can they differ between negative and positive lengths in a plane? In the proof, an obvious step is that AY=-YA. But BZ apparently equal ZB. This makes it even more confusing. Can someone please explain how and why they differ between negative and positive values of the lengths in the plane?

I proved the case where the line does not intersect the triangle in a similar way as the first proof. The reason for that the product is minus one beats me. Why differ between positive and negative values?

Appreciate any help.

EDIT: I think I got it. When a point is internally dividing a line segment, the ratio is positive, and when it's dividing the segment extrernally, it's negative, as mentioned earlier in the chapter. yay
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top