Solve Millikan Experiment Homework: Calculate Mass of Bearing

AI Thread Summary
To solve the homework problem of calculating the mass of a single ball bearing using twelve cans, one must first determine the mass of the cans after excluding the empty one. The smallest mass difference identified was 2.3 g, but verification is needed to ensure all can masses are multiples of this value. If discrepancies arise, exploring smaller increments like half or a third of 2.3 g is suggested to find a consistent mass. Accuracy in measurements is crucial, with a recommended error margin of ±0.05 g, which can affect the calculated mass of the bearings. Ultimately, experimenting with the provided masses while considering measurement errors may reveal a suitable mass for the bearings.
rkimbel
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are given twelve cans (one of which is empty) which are filled with a certain number of ball bearings. Using nothing more than a balance, calculate the mass of a single bearing


Homework Equations


Total Mass=Mo+n(mo)
Where total mass=mass of ball bearings
Mo=smallest mass
n=number of bearings
mo= mass of each bearing

The Attempt at a Solution


I realize the equation above is a little confusing (formatting in PF is not easy). The way I attempted this problem was by first trying to organize the mass of the twelve cans (after subtracting the mass of the empty can, of course). I found the smallest difference between two masses, which was 2.3 g. From this point, however, I'm not sure what to do. I could possible divide each mass by 2.3 g, giving me the theoretical number of ball bearings. But I don't see how I could verify my answer. Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably have the answer with 2.3 g. Do check to make sure all the can masses (less empty can mass) are multiples of 2.3. If not, try half of 2.3, then a third of 2.3 until it works.

Millikan continued looking for smaller charges for 20 years before publishing your results!
 
The problem I was having, however, was dealing with error. Assuming the mass is 2.3 g, then these cans have a lot of balls in them (up to 50). 2.3 g does not go into each mass evenly, but that doesn't mean I should look for a smaller number (right?). Obviously, 0.1 g would be a factor of each but that's not correct.
 
Yes, some judgment about accuracy is certainly needed! Just thinking ...
The numbers are given to one decimal place, so an accuracy of plus or minus 0.05 g on the given measurements is suggested. If one of the cans measures 25 g, we could note that 24.95/2.3 = 10.8 and 25.05/2.3 = 10.9, so 2.3 g is not a possible marble mass. But the 2.3 g comes from subtracting two numbers that are each +/- .05, so it could be out by up to .1 g and 25/11 = 2.27 g is a possible marble mass.

Maybe playing around like this with all the given masses would turn up a marble mass that works to within the error in measurement. Curious, if the accuracy of measurement is really +/- .05 then the LARGEST can mass yields the finest suggested marble mass because the error gets divided by a large number of marbles. Usually you get a % error - but I don't think you do with mass balances.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top