I Solve Null Geodesic: Affine Parameter & Coordinate Time - Q1,Q2,Q3

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
I am asked a question about how far a light ray travels, the question is to be solved by solving for the null goedesic.

I am given the initial data: the light ray is fired in the ##x## direction at ##t=0##.

The relvant coordinates in the question are ##t,x,y,z##, let ##s## be the affine paramater I parameterise the geodesics with.

MY QUESTION

Q1)Concerning the intial data, does this mean that at ##t=0##, ##\dot{y}=\dot{z}=0## and ##\dot(z)\neq 0 ##? where ##\dot{x}## denotes ##\frac{dx}{ds}## .

Q2)And not ##\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{dz}{dt}=0##? can we only make conclusions on the change with respect ##s##, or is it with respect to the coordinate time ##t## too?

Q3)Also, is one always free to choose initially that ##s=t=0##. If so, then if the answer to question 1 is yes, doesn't this imply the answer to question 2 is yes?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
let sss be the affine paramater I parameterise the geodesics with
I think you can't use proper time as the affine parameter for null geodesics.
 
davidge said:
I think you can't use proper time as the affine parameter for null geodesics.

You can't, but I don't see the OP doing that.
 
binbagsss said:
Concerning the intial data, does this mean that at ##t=0##, ##\dot{y}=\dot{z}=0## and ##(\dot(z)) \neq 0## ? where ##\dot{x}## denotes ##\frac{dx}{ds}##.

It means ##\dot{y} = \dot{z} = 0##, since that's what "in the ##x## direction" is supposed to mean. I'm not sure what the third thing is that you are asking if it's not equal to zero; but at ##t = 0##, you will have ##\dot{t} \neq 0## and ##\dot{s} \neq 0##.

binbagsss said:
And not ##\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{dz}{dt}=0##?

Those will be true too. The proof is easy: you have ##\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{dy}{ds} \frac{ds}{dt}## by the chain rule, so the fact that ##\frac{dy}{ds} = 0## implies that ##\frac{dy}{dt} = 0##. Similarly for ##\frac{dz}{dt}##.

binbagsss said:
is one always free to choose initially that ##s=t=0##.

Yes.

binbagsss said:
if the answer to question 1 is yes, doesn't this imply the answer to question 2 is yes?

No, because choosing ##s = t = 0## at the initial event doesn't tell you anything by itself about their derivatives, or derivatives with respect to them. But as above, you can answer question 2 anyway.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
906
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
9K
Replies
26
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top