Solve Peskin's QFT Eqn 2.54 with Hints

  • Thread starter Thread starter ananya J
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin Qft
ananya J
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
QFT Peskin p.30 eqn 2.54

Homework Statement



i am perplexed with eqn 2.54 peskins introductory qft. just can't make out how to arrive at it from the previous step. i think that there are dirac delta funtions involved but simply can't make it out. can somebody help? provide some hint? thanks in advance for ur time

3. The Attempt at a Solution
\int\ \frac{d^3p} {(2\pi)^3}\ \{ \frac {1}{2E_p}\ e^{-ip.(x-y)}\left|_{p^0 = E_p}\ +\ \frac {1}{-2E_p}\ e^{-ip.(x-y)}\left|_{p^0 = -E_p}\ \}= \int\ \frac{d^3p} {(2\pi)^3}\ \int\ \frac{dp^0} {2p^0}\ e^{-ip.(x-y)}\ \{ \delta (p_0-E_p) +\delta (p_0+E_p)\ \} = \int\ \frac{d^3p} {(2\pi)^3}\ \int\ dp^0\ e^{-ip.(x-y)}\ \delta(p^2-m^2)

dont know if iam on the right track.pls correct me if am wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be good, if you would write down the equation you want to prove, since I don't have the mentioned book...
 
What P&S are doing in Eqn. 2.54 is re-writing a three-dimensional integral as a four-dimensional integral:
\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{2E_p}[\exp(-ip\cdot(x - y)) - \exp(ip\cdot (x - y))] = \int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\int\frac{dp^0}{2\pi i}\ \frac{-1}{p^2 - m^2}\exp(-ip\cdot(x - y)),
where x^0 > y^0.

What I would do to understand this is start from the latter form and perform the p^0 integral. Break up the denominator into
p^2 - m^2 = (p^0)^2 - \textbf p^2 - m^2,
which has poles at
p^0 = \pm \sqrt{\textbf p^2 + m^2} = \pm E_p.
Contour integration should produce the first expression in the original post [which P&S give as an intermediate step] without too much trouble.
 
i jumped into conclusions before reading the text further. sorry. anyways thanks so much for ur time & help.:smile:
 
Last edited:
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top