Solve Quadratic Equation: y^2 - 12y + 32 = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter fbsthreads
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
To solve the quadratic equation y^2 - 12y + 32 = 0, it can be factored into (y-8)(y-4) = 0. This factorization is derived from identifying two numbers, a and b, that satisfy the conditions a + b = 12 and ab = 32, which are -8 and -4. An alternative method involves completing the square, transforming the equation into (y-6)^2 - 4 = 0, which also leads to the same factors. Setting the factors equal to zero gives the solutions y = 8 and y = 4. Understanding these steps clarifies the process of factoring quadratic equations.
fbsthreads
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
in a maths book i have there is an example of solving a quadratic. part of the process reads:

y^2 - 12y + 32 = 0


implies that


(y-8) (y-4) = 0



i don't understand how this second equation was reached based on the first one.

could someone add in the steps that gets me from the first equation to the implication.

thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
fbsthreads said:
in a maths book i have there is an example of solving a quadratic. part of the process reads:

y^2 - 12y + 32 = 0


implies that


(y-8) (y-4) = 0



i don't understand how this second equation was reached based on the first one.

could someone add in the steps that gets me from the first equation to the implication.

thanks.
expand:

(y + a)(y + b)

and you get:

y^2 + (a+b)y + ab

so from your equation above you know that:

a + b = -12

and

ab = 32

as

-8 + -4 = -12

and

-8*-4 = 32

a and b must be -8 and -4.
 
i don't think you can, it is obvious.

if you actually want the logics of thinking its like this:

we want to express the quadratic as (y-a)(y-b),

now a*b = 32

and a + b = 12

so try all the integers you can think of, you'll find 8 and 4 does.
 
A simple way uses the idea of "completing the square:
y^{2}-12y+32=0
Now, regarding -12=2*(-6), we add 0 to our equation in this manner:
y^{2}-12y+32+(-6)^{2}-(-6)^{2}=0
Or, equivalently, for the Left Hand Side:
y^{2}-12y+32+(-6)^{2}-(-6)^{2}=(y^{2}-2*6y+6^{2})+(32-6^{2})=(y-6)^{2}-4
Furthermore, since 4=2^{2} we have:
(y-6)^{2}-4=(y-6)^{2}-2^{2}=(y-6+2)(y-6-2)=(y-4)(y-8)

Finally, by setting this expression (which is equivalent to our original left hand side) equal to our originil right hand side (that is,0) we gain:
(y-4)(y-8)=0
as required.
 
thanks people.
it was the bit i have highlighted in bold that i had forgotten about when trying to work it out.

y^2 + (a+b)y + ab

thanks again.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top