Solve Quantum Mechanics: Probability of Spin-1/2 Particle

ProjectionSpin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Quantum Mechanics Help [Probability of a Spin-1/2 Particle]

Part 1) \hat{S} is a spin-1/2 operator, \vec n is a unit vector, \vert{\psi_\pm}\rangle are normalized eigenvectors of n\cdot\hat{S} with eigenvectors \pm\frac12. Write \vert{\psi_\pm}\rangle in terms of \vert{+z}\rangle and \vert{-z}\rangle.

Part 2) \vec n_1 and \vec n_2 are unit vectors. A measurement found the projection of spin-1/2 on the direction \vec n_1 to be 1/2. Use the results of the previous part to show that a subsequent measurement of the projection of spin on the direction \vec n_2 will give 1/2 with probability

P=\frac12(1+\vec n_1\cdot\vec n_2)







The attempt at a solution
First I declare what my normal vector \vec n will be, \vec n = (sin\theta\cos\phi,\ \sin\theta\sin\phi,\ \cos\theta)

I then solve for \sum_i\vec n\cdot\hat{S}_i and started looking for the eigenstates, which lead to

\mu=\pm 1

Setting this up lead me to
\langle -z\vert\psi_+\rangle=-e^{i\phi}\frac{\cos\theta-1}{\sin\theta}\langle+z\vert\psi_+\rangle
which, after normalizing, I then find
\vert\psi_+\rangle=\cos\frac\theta2\vert+z\rangle+e^{-i\phi}\sin\frac\theta2\vert-z\rangle

Likewise, when I use \mu=-1 I find

\vert\psi_-\rangle=\sin\frac\theta2\vert+z\rangle-e^{i\phi}\cos\frac\theta2\vert-z\rangle

**This officially marks the end of part 1**

For part 2, I assumed that "the projection of spin-1/2 on the direction n⃗ 1 to be 1/2" was equivalent to
\langle \vec n\vert\vec n_1\rangle=\frac12

But supposably this is not the case, which leaves me to just being confused on where to go.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ProjectionSpin said:
For part 2, I assumed that "the projection of spin-1/2 on the direction n⃗ 1 to be 1/2" was equivalent to
\langle \vec n\vert\vec n_1\rangle=\frac12
There is no ##\vec{n}## in part b. The problem mentions the measurement of the projection of the spin in the direction of ##\vec{n}_1##. How do you translate that into mathematical terms?
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top