Solve Rotational Dynamics Homework: Hollow Cylinder, Weight, String

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in rotational dynamics involving a hollow cylinder connected by a string to a weight. The participants are tasked with determining the angular and linear accelerations of the cylinder, as well as the acceleration of the weight and the tension in the string, under the condition that the cylinder rolls without slipping.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of Newton's second law and torque equations, considering the moment of inertia and the effects of friction. There are attempts to relate linear and angular accelerations, and some participants question the role of friction in the context of rolling without slipping.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the calculations of moment of inertia and the relationship between different forces acting on the system. There is no explicit consensus yet on the correct approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of rolling motion and the assumptions regarding friction. There are also considerations about the moment of inertia calculations, particularly in relation to the hollow nature of the cylinder and the density of the materials involved.

golanor
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A hollow cylinder of internal radius r and external radius R and mass M is connected by a string to a weight m.
What are the angular and linear acceleration of the cylinder? Assume that the cylinder is rolling without slipping.
What is the acceleration of the weight and what is the tension on the string?

Homework Equations


*everything*


The Attempt at a Solution


First, by using dimensional analysis i can see that the solution should be something along the lines of:
a=\frac{m*r}{M*R}g
I tried to do Newton's second law, for the cylinder i get that:
\sum F=T=\text{Ma}
torque:
\sum \tau =T*R=\text{I$\alpha $}
moment of inertia around the center of mass:
I=M\left(R^2-r^2\right)
and the relation between the angular and linear acceleration:
\alpha =\frac{a}{r}

I have no idea what i did wrong or what do i need to do next.
Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    5.9 KB · Views: 472
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the cylinder is rolling, you need to be a bit careful about the moments. If you take moments about the centre of mass of the cylinder then you have to include the torque from friction at the point of contact. Alternatively, you can take moments about the point of contact and use the parallel axis theorem for the moment of inertia.
You've left friction out of the linear acceleration equation for the cylinder.
You also need a linear acceleration equation for the mass m.
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
Because the cylinder is rolling, you need to be a bit careful about the moments. If you take moments about the centre of mass of the cylinder then you have to include the torque from friction at the point of contact. Alternatively, you can take moments about the point of contact and use the parallel axis theorem for the moment of inertia.
You've left friction out of the linear acceleration equation for the cylinder.
You also need a linear acceleration equation for the mass m.

\sum F=m*g-T=m*a

Shouldn't the friction be 0, since the cylinder is rolling without slipping?
 
golanor said:
\sum F=m*g-T=m*a
Yes.
Shouldn't the friction be 0, since the cylinder is rolling without slipping?
If the friction is zero it's sure to slip. 'Rolling' tells you that static friction is enough to prevent slipping.
 
golanor said:

I tried to do Newton's second law, for the cylinder i get that:
\sum F=T=\text{Ma}
torque:
\sum \tau =T*R=\text{I$\alpha $}
moment of inertia around the center of mass:
I=M\left(R^2-r^2\right)


haruspex said:
If the friction is zero it's sure to slip. 'Rolling' tells you that static friction is enough to prevent slipping.

I understand..just got confused by something we proved in class.
So, the linear acceleration should be: \sum F=T-f=M*a_1
and the torque around the center of mass: \sum \tau =R(T+f)=\text{I$\alpha $}
Around the point of contact: \sum \tau =2R*T=\text{I$\alpha $}
And in this case, the moment of inertia will be I=M\left(R^2-r^2\right)+M\left(R^2\right)
 
golanor said:
And in this case, the moment of inertia will be I=M\left(R^2-r^2\right)+M\left(R^2\right)
A couple of problems with the first term on the RHS there. What would the MI be about the cylinder's centre if r were only a little less than R?
 
haruspex said:
A couple of problems with the first term on the RHS there. What would the MI be about the cylinder's centre if r were only a little less than R?

Well, i forgot the 1/2 there. it's basically the MI of the large cylinder minus the one we took out. They are co-centric so there is no distance to add. if i look at extreme cases - r<<R it's as if the cylinder is complete, r=R - there is no mass. = the equation makes sense.
I=\frac{1}{2}M(2R^{2}-r^{2}) - this is relative to the contact point.
i know it's wrong tho, since when i put it into the equation i get r^{2}=0
the thing is, i don't know what I'm doing wrong.
 
golanor said:
it's basically the MI of the large cylinder minus the one we took out.

How do you know the mass of the cylinder you took out is the equal to the mass of the original cylinder?
 
MrWarlock616 said:
How do you know the mass of the cylinder you took out is the equal to the mass of the original cylinder?

They have the same density.
I=\rho \left(\int _0^h\int _0^{2\pi }\int _0^Rr^3drd\phi dz+\int _0^h\int _0^{2\pi }\int _0^rr^3drd\phi dz\right)=\frac{M}{\pi *h\left(R^2-r^2\right)}h*\frac{\pi }{2}\left(R^4-r^4\right)=\frac{M}{2}\left(R^2+r^2\right)
 
  • #10
golanor said:
They have the same density.
I=\frac{M}{2}\left(R^2+r^2\right)
That's better. (And of course +MR2 for parallel axis.)
 
  • #11
The point I missed was the relation between the cylinder's acceleration and the weight's acceleration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K