Solve Rotational Dynamics Homework: Hollow Cylinder, Weight, String

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a hollow cylinder connected by a string to a weight, analyzing the angular and linear accelerations. Key equations include Newton's second law, torque equations, and the moment of inertia for the hollow cylinder. Participants emphasize the importance of considering static friction to prevent slipping and correctly applying the parallel axis theorem for the moment of inertia. There is confusion regarding the mass distribution and moment of inertia calculations, particularly when subtracting the mass of the inner cylinder. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of forces and torques in rolling motion scenarios.
golanor
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A hollow cylinder of internal radius r and external radius R and mass M is connected by a string to a weight m.
What are the angular and linear acceleration of the cylinder? Assume that the cylinder is rolling without slipping.
What is the acceleration of the weight and what is the tension on the string?

Homework Equations


*everything*


The Attempt at a Solution


First, by using dimensional analysis i can see that the solution should be something along the lines of:
a=\frac{m*r}{M*R}g
I tried to do Newton's second law, for the cylinder i get that:
\sum F=T=\text{Ma}
torque:
\sum \tau =T*R=\text{I$\alpha $}
moment of inertia around the center of mass:
I=M\left(R^2-r^2\right)
and the relation between the angular and linear acceleration:
\alpha =\frac{a}{r}

I have no idea what i did wrong or what do i need to do next.
Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    5.9 KB · Views: 453
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the cylinder is rolling, you need to be a bit careful about the moments. If you take moments about the centre of mass of the cylinder then you have to include the torque from friction at the point of contact. Alternatively, you can take moments about the point of contact and use the parallel axis theorem for the moment of inertia.
You've left friction out of the linear acceleration equation for the cylinder.
You also need a linear acceleration equation for the mass m.
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
Because the cylinder is rolling, you need to be a bit careful about the moments. If you take moments about the centre of mass of the cylinder then you have to include the torque from friction at the point of contact. Alternatively, you can take moments about the point of contact and use the parallel axis theorem for the moment of inertia.
You've left friction out of the linear acceleration equation for the cylinder.
You also need a linear acceleration equation for the mass m.

\sum F=m*g-T=m*a

Shouldn't the friction be 0, since the cylinder is rolling without slipping?
 
golanor said:
\sum F=m*g-T=m*a
Yes.
Shouldn't the friction be 0, since the cylinder is rolling without slipping?
If the friction is zero it's sure to slip. 'Rolling' tells you that static friction is enough to prevent slipping.
 
golanor said:

I tried to do Newton's second law, for the cylinder i get that:
\sum F=T=\text{Ma}
torque:
\sum \tau =T*R=\text{I$\alpha $}
moment of inertia around the center of mass:
I=M\left(R^2-r^2\right)


haruspex said:
If the friction is zero it's sure to slip. 'Rolling' tells you that static friction is enough to prevent slipping.

I understand..just got confused by something we proved in class.
So, the linear acceleration should be: \sum F=T-f=M*a_1
and the torque around the center of mass: \sum \tau =R(T+f)=\text{I$\alpha $}
Around the point of contact: \sum \tau =2R*T=\text{I$\alpha $}
And in this case, the moment of inertia will be I=M\left(R^2-r^2\right)+M\left(R^2\right)
 
golanor said:
And in this case, the moment of inertia will be I=M\left(R^2-r^2\right)+M\left(R^2\right)
A couple of problems with the first term on the RHS there. What would the MI be about the cylinder's centre if r were only a little less than R?
 
haruspex said:
A couple of problems with the first term on the RHS there. What would the MI be about the cylinder's centre if r were only a little less than R?

Well, i forgot the 1/2 there. it's basically the MI of the large cylinder minus the one we took out. They are co-centric so there is no distance to add. if i look at extreme cases - r<<R it's as if the cylinder is complete, r=R - there is no mass. = the equation makes sense.
I=\frac{1}{2}M(2R^{2}-r^{2}) - this is relative to the contact point.
i know it's wrong tho, since when i put it into the equation i get r^{2}=0
the thing is, i don't know what I'm doing wrong.
 
golanor said:
it's basically the MI of the large cylinder minus the one we took out.

How do you know the mass of the cylinder you took out is the equal to the mass of the original cylinder?
 
MrWarlock616 said:
How do you know the mass of the cylinder you took out is the equal to the mass of the original cylinder?

They have the same density.
I=\rho \left(\int _0^h\int _0^{2\pi }\int _0^Rr^3drd\phi dz+\int _0^h\int _0^{2\pi }\int _0^rr^3drd\phi dz\right)=\frac{M}{\pi *h\left(R^2-r^2\right)}h*\frac{\pi }{2}\left(R^4-r^4\right)=\frac{M}{2}\left(R^2+r^2\right)
 
  • #10
golanor said:
They have the same density.
I=\frac{M}{2}\left(R^2+r^2\right)
That's better. (And of course +MR2 for parallel axis.)
 
  • #11
The point I missed was the relation between the cylinder's acceleration and the weight's acceleration.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top