Solve Satellite Altitude Above Earth's Surface | 16.7 kN, -1.43e11 J

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninjagowoowoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
AI Thread Summary
To find the altitude of a communication satellite above Earth's surface, gravitational force and potential energy equations can be utilized. The gravitational force acting on the satellite is 16.7 kN, and the gravitational potential energy is -1.43 x 10^11 J. The radius of the Earth is given as 6.38 x 10^6 m. The discussion emphasizes that while the approach using two unknowns (mass of the satellite and height) is valid, there are alternative methods to simplify the calculations. Overall, the participants confirm that the original method is correct and can lead to the desired solution.
ninjagowoowoo
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
When in orbit, a communication satellite attracts the Earth with a force of 16.7 kN and the earth-satellite gravitational potential energy (relative to zero at infinite separation) is - 1.43*10^11 J. Find the satellite's altitude above the Earth's surface. The radius of the Earth is 6.38*10^6.

OK, I must be making this harder than it needs to be. What I've been trying to do is to use the formulas for gravitational force to get an equation with two unknow variables (Mass of the satellite and height above Earth's surface) And I do the same for gravitational potential energy. Then, since both equations have the same two unknown variables, I solve for one of them and substitute. Is there another way of doing this? Am I doing it copmletely wrong? Please help me! :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You sound like you have the right idea. Give it a shot.
 
Total Energy of a satellite revolving around Earth is given by:

- \frac{GMm}{2r}

BJ


Note:This post has been edited after Older Dan's remarks.
 
Last edited:
Dr.Brain said:
Potential Energy of a satellite revolving around Earth is given by:

- \frac{GMm}{2r}

BJ
There is no 2 in the potential energy. Perhaps you meant the total energy

U = - \frac{GMm}{r}

T = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{r}{2} \left( \frac{mv^2}{r} \right) = \frac{r}{2} \left| F_c \right| = \frac{r}{2} \left( \frac{GMm}{r^2} \right) = \frac{GMm}{2r} = -\frac{1}{2} U

E\ \ =\ \ T\ \ +\ \ U = \frac{GMm}{2r}\ \ -\ \ \frac{GMm}{r}\ \ =\ \ - \frac{GMm}{2r}
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top