Solve Simple RL Circuit: Find and Sketch y(t)

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kdinser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Rl circuit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on analyzing a simple RL circuit where a switch opens at t=0. The user is uncertain whether the second inductor (2H) is charged before the switch opens, leading to two conflicting interpretations of the current y(t). The first interpretation, supported by Laplace transforms and PSPICE simulations, suggests y(t) remains at 5 amps indefinitely. The second interpretation posits that the second inductor is uncharged at t=0, resulting in a contradiction in current flow. The user concludes that the problem may be ill-posed due to conflicting current values at the moment the switch opens.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RL circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with Laplace transforms in circuit analysis
  • Experience using PSPICE for circuit simulation
  • Knowledge of inductor behavior in DC circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of DC transient analysis in RL circuits
  • Learn how to apply Laplace transforms to solve circuit differential equations
  • Explore PSPICE simulation techniques for transient analysis
  • Investigate the concept of ill-posed problems in circuit theory
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in transient analysis of RL circuits will benefit from this discussion.

kdinser
Messages
335
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The switch is closed for a long time and opened instantaneously at t=0. Find and sketch the current y(t).


I haven’t had a class where I needed to do DC transient circuit analysis for over a year, so this simple thing is giving me some problems.


The way I see it, either:

1. The inductor that is parallel with the switch (2nd inductor) is fully charged at t=0 and opening the switch has no effect on the current y(t) and y(t) = 5 amps at all time t. Which is what my solution using laplace transforms is showing and what pspice seems to confirm.

OR

2. The 2nd inductor has not been charged at all at t=0 because all the current is running through the closed switch. This would mean that I'm making some kind of serious error when I set up my equation, because when I try to make this assumption, I get a final current below 5 amps at t=infinity so I know that can't be right.

Thanks for any help, if I'm wrong on both accounts, I'll start posting equations so I can get this figured out.


Just noticed that my jpg says pending approval. To draw this circuit, put a 10V voltage source in series with a 1H inductor, a 2 ohm resistor, and a 2H inductor in a closed loop. Then add a switch that opens at t=0 and is closed at t < 0 in parallel with the 2H inductor.
 

Attachments

  • circuit.JPG
    circuit.JPG
    11.6 KB · Views: 729
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is more of the latter, that the 2H inductor is not charged before t = 0. My reason for saying so is as follows: The voltage across the 2H is always 0V before the switch opens. Then Ldi/dt = 0, or in other words, there is no change in the current across this inductor, hence it remains at 0A.

This, however, presents a huge problem when the switch opens since you would then have both 5A (over the 1H) and 0A (over the 2H) flowing in the same loop at t = 0 (which is impossible, of course). That being so, I would rate this problem as an ill-posed problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K