Solve Spring Compression Problem: Work & Energy Approach

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a ball fired from a spring, using work and energy principles. The ball's mass is 0.1 kg, the spring constant is 50,000 N/m, and the spring is compressed by 2 m. The calculated height the ball should reach, assuming no friction, is approximately 102,038 m, which participants find implausibly high. For part B, the challenge lies in determining the frictional work done by air, with hints that the relationship between non-conservative forces and mechanical energy is key to solving it. The consensus suggests that the problem's parameters may be unrealistic, complicating the analysis of air resistance effects.
reklaws89
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use work and energy to solve the following. A .1 kg ball is placed against a massless spring that has a stretch constant 50,000 N/m and is compressed 2 m. The spring fires the ball straight up. a) How far did the ball rise assuming no friction? b) The ball's actual rise was 2m short of the answer in part A. What was the frictional work done by air?


Homework Equations


1/2ky^2=mg(h+y)


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured out part A to be 102,038 m... which seems outrageous, but the numbers in this problem are also outrageous. I'm really just struggling on how to do B or even attempt it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show some work to get help here. How did you end up with your answer in part a?
 
I used the equation (KE + PEg + PEs)i = (KE + PEg + PEs)f

KEi=0
KEf=0
PEgi=0
PEsf=0

PEsi=1/2ky^2
(y=compression)
PEgf=mg(h+y)
(h=distance traveled)

therefore, 1/2ky^2=mg(h+y)
so 1/2(50,000N/m)(4m)^2=.1kg(9.8m/s^2)(h+2m)
100,000Nm=.98N(h+2m)
102,040m=h+2m
102,038m=h
 
Looks correct, but as you say, the numbers given are outrageous. And if air friction causes the ball to stop 2 feet short of 102,038', that's not even significant enough to bother with. I think the problem just chose a poor set of numbers. But for part B, in general, what do you know about the relationship between work done by non conservative forces, and mechanical energy?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top