Solve Spring SHM Problem: Period of Oscillation in M1, M2, k

  • Thread starter Thread starter brendan3eb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm Spring
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two blocks of different masses connected by a spring on a frictionless surface, and the goal is to determine the period of oscillation in terms of the masses and spring constant. The relevant equation for the period of oscillation is T = 2π√(m/k). To solve, one must consider the center of mass and the relative positions of the blocks, defining the distance between them as x = x1 - x2. By applying force equations on the spring and manipulating them, the angular frequency can be derived, leading to the period of oscillation. Understanding the system's dynamics and performing algebraic reductions are essential for finding the solution.
brendan3eb
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks of mass M2 and M1 (M2>M1) are connected by a spring with force constant k and are free to slide on a frictionless table. They are pulled apart and then released from rest. In terms of M1, M2, and k, what would the period of oscillation be?


Homework Equations


T=2PI*sqrt(m/k)
f=-kx


The Attempt at a Solution


So taking the starting position to be both blocks just before they released, one full cycle would be when they have both returned to their initial positions. Other than noting this, the problem leaves me perplexed as to what to do next..all I need is a hint in the right direction. I guess just picturing such an apparatus in my head is mind-boggling. Would the equilibrium point remain the same or would it start to expand and contract abnormally?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The CM wouldn't move, so you could start by taking that as the origin. Take x1 and x2 to be the positions of the masses etc. Now, write the force eqns on the springs. Take x=x1-x2, the dist between the two springs.

Your aim is to only find the w. Once you have reduced the two eqns to a form of Mx'' = -k'x, for some M, then directly you can find w. A bit of algebraic manipulation is reqd.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top