Solve Statics Problem: Find Theta Angle Balance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ortix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
Ortix
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
I basically have to solve the system below for which angle theta it's in balance. Meaning all forces equal out to 0. The answer is in terms of the variables.
inqjf.png


It's been a while since I've done statics like this but it has come back to bite me in the *** again.

I started out by moments about A:
2L*cos(θ)*Cx - P*L*sin(θ)

But now what? If I do sum of forces in X I get that Ax = Cx and then I get stuck with the sum of forces in Y

Do I have to make a cut somewhere? Not sure about to go about solving with the spring.

The answer is:
cos(θ) = 0.5*(1+(P/2kL))

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At C, there is an unknown horizontal force C<->wall, a vertical force (depends on the position of C only via the spring) and an unknown force along BC. You can relate theta to the position of C, and that allows to determine the two unknown forces.
Consider the equlibrium at B to relate the force in the lower arm to the force in the upper arm. That might be sufficient to solve the problem, otherwise consider forces at A.
 
with the unknown force along BC do you mean the normal force inside the beam?
 
Ortix said:
with the unknown force along BC do you mean the normal force inside the beam?
The compression force in the beam. Note that because of the free joints at each end, there can be no torque passed through the beam.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top