Solve Summation Question: T(n) Recurrence Form

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamesvanboxtel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying the recurrence relation T(n) = T(n-1) + ∑_{i=1}^{(n-1)/2} [(n-(i+1)) * (i-1) * 2 + 2], with an additional term for even n. Participants suggest manipulating the equation by moving terms and summing over n to facilitate simplification. They propose considering separate cases for odd and even n, and one user suggests creating a new series to pair terms, potentially eliminating the need for distinguishing between odd and even cases. The conversation highlights the complexity of the summation and the need for a clear approach to derive a closed form or simplified version of T(n). Overall, the thread emphasizes collaborative problem-solving in tackling complex recurrence relations.
jamesvanboxtel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have the following recurrence that I am trying to come up with atleast a simplified version if not a closed form.

T(n) = T(n-1) + \sum_{i=1}^{(n-1)/2} [(n-(i+1)) * (i-1) * 2 + 2]

in addition if n is even I must add the following to T(n)
((n/2) - 1)^2If any of you can help that would be awesome.

BTW this forum looks really cool.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This isn't all that clear but why not move the term on the right and have T(n) - T(n-1)
then sum over n from 1 to n (if summing over n with top limit n is confusing index to a different letter, it won't make a difference in the end)on both sides for a double sum on the right.
Then the left will be have T(n) - T(0) , the T(0) you may know.
As for the right since only multiplication seems to be involved prominently the original summational need not be a problem though I'm not sure of the second that I suggested(over n)
You'll need to consider separate cases for n odd or even also. Hope I interpreted correctly.
 
Of course, the constant +2 can be taken out of the sum; summing +2 in a loop, 'm' times, is just adding 2*m.

One question: do you really need each and all T(n)? Because maybe you could sum the terms in pairs, that is, construct a new series 'A' where A(0)=T(0)+T(1), A(1)=T(2)+T(3), A(2)=T(4)+T(5) and so on, so that the special case for even/odd terms dissapears.
 
Turns out I was able to enter the first few results here and come up with what the pattern was.

http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/

Thanks for trying though guys.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top