MHB Solve the cubic equation 4u^3+3u−3=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Given the depressed cubic equation:

$4u^3+3u-3 =0$(1). Solve the equation with the substitution: $u = \sinh x$.

(2). Solve the equation without this substitution.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

(1)

\(
4u^3+3u-3=4\sinh^3 x+3\sinh x -3
=\frac 4{2^3}(e^{x}-e^{-x})^3+\frac 32(e^{x}-e^{-x}) -3 \\
=\frac 12(e^{3x}-3e^{x}+3e^{-x}-e^{-3x}) + \frac 32(e^{x}-e^{-x}) -3
=\frac 12(e^{3x}-e^{-3x}) -3 = \sinh(3x) - 3 =0
\)

So $x=\frac 13\arsinh(3)$.
And $u=\sinh(\frac 13\arsinh(3))\approx 0.644$.(2)

Define $u=\frac 12(x+y)$.
Then:

\(
4u^3+3u-3
=\frac{4}{2^3}(x+y)^3+\frac 32(x+y)-3
=\frac 12(x^3+y^3+3xy(x+y)) + \frac 32 (x+y) - 3 \\
=\frac 12(x^3+y^3-6) + \frac 32 (xy + 1)(x+y)
= 0
\)

We have the freedom to pick $y$ arbitrarily and we pick $y$ such that \( xy+1=0 \Rightarrow y=-\frac 1x \).
It follows that:

\( x^3+y^3-6=x^3-x^{-3}-6=0 \Rightarrow (x^3)^2-6(x^3)-1=0
\Rightarrow x^3=3\pm\sqrt{10} \\
\Rightarrow x=\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}+3}\lor x=-\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}-3}
\)

Since the same solutions will hold if we had swapped $x$ and $y$, we can conclude that we can pick $x$ to be the first solution and $y$ to be the second solution.
Substituting gives us \( u=\frac 12\left(\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}+3} - \sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}-3}\right) \approx 0.644\).I see some similarity between both methods and I'm still wondering how close they are. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
My solution:

(1)

\(
4u^3+3u-3=4\sinh^3 x+3\sinh x -3
=\frac 4{2^3}(e^{ix}-e^{-ix})^3+\frac 32(e^{ix}-e^{-ix}) -3 \\
=\frac 12(e^{3ix}-3e^{ix}+3e^{-ix}-e^{-3ix}) + \frac 32(e^{ix}-e^{-ix}) -3
=\frac 12(e^{3ix}-e^{-3ix}) -3 = \sinh(3x) - 3 =0
\)

So $x=\frac 13\arsinh(3)$.
And $u=\sinh(\frac 13\arsinh(3))\approx 0.644$.(2)

Define $u=\frac 12(x+y)$.
Then:

\(
4u^3+3u-3
=\frac{4}{2^3}(x+y)^3+\frac 32(x+y)-3
=\frac 12(x^3+y^3+3xy(x+y)) + \frac 32 (x+y) - 3 \\
=\frac 12(x^3+y^3-6) + \frac 32 (xy + 1)(x+y)
= 0
\)

We have the freedom to pick $y$ arbitrarily and we pick $y$ such that \( xy+1=0 \Rightarrow y=-\frac 1x \).
It follows that:

\( x^3+y^3-6=x^3-x^{-3}-6=0 \Rightarrow (x^3)^2-6(x^3)-1=0
\Rightarrow x^3=3\pm\sqrt{10} \\
\Rightarrow x=\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}+3}\lor x=-\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}-3}
\)

Since the same solutions will hold if we had swapped $x$ and $y$, we can conclude that we can pick $x$ to be the first solution and $y$ to be the second solution.
Substituting gives us \( u=\frac 12\left(\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}+3} - \sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}-3}\right) \approx 0.644\).I see some similarity between both methods and I'm still wondering how close they are. (Thinking)
Brilliant, I like Serena! Your solution in (2). is new to me. Very nice indeed. Thankyou for your participation!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top