MHB Solve the cubic equation 4u^3+3u−3=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Given the depressed cubic equation:

$4u^3+3u-3 =0$(1). Solve the equation with the substitution: $u = \sinh x$.

(2). Solve the equation without this substitution.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

(1)

\(
4u^3+3u-3=4\sinh^3 x+3\sinh x -3
=\frac 4{2^3}(e^{x}-e^{-x})^3+\frac 32(e^{x}-e^{-x}) -3 \\
=\frac 12(e^{3x}-3e^{x}+3e^{-x}-e^{-3x}) + \frac 32(e^{x}-e^{-x}) -3
=\frac 12(e^{3x}-e^{-3x}) -3 = \sinh(3x) - 3 =0
\)

So $x=\frac 13\arsinh(3)$.
And $u=\sinh(\frac 13\arsinh(3))\approx 0.644$.(2)

Define $u=\frac 12(x+y)$.
Then:

\(
4u^3+3u-3
=\frac{4}{2^3}(x+y)^3+\frac 32(x+y)-3
=\frac 12(x^3+y^3+3xy(x+y)) + \frac 32 (x+y) - 3 \\
=\frac 12(x^3+y^3-6) + \frac 32 (xy + 1)(x+y)
= 0
\)

We have the freedom to pick $y$ arbitrarily and we pick $y$ such that \( xy+1=0 \Rightarrow y=-\frac 1x \).
It follows that:

\( x^3+y^3-6=x^3-x^{-3}-6=0 \Rightarrow (x^3)^2-6(x^3)-1=0
\Rightarrow x^3=3\pm\sqrt{10} \\
\Rightarrow x=\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}+3}\lor x=-\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}-3}
\)

Since the same solutions will hold if we had swapped $x$ and $y$, we can conclude that we can pick $x$ to be the first solution and $y$ to be the second solution.
Substituting gives us \( u=\frac 12\left(\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}+3} - \sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}-3}\right) \approx 0.644\).I see some similarity between both methods and I'm still wondering how close they are. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
My solution:

(1)

\(
4u^3+3u-3=4\sinh^3 x+3\sinh x -3
=\frac 4{2^3}(e^{ix}-e^{-ix})^3+\frac 32(e^{ix}-e^{-ix}) -3 \\
=\frac 12(e^{3ix}-3e^{ix}+3e^{-ix}-e^{-3ix}) + \frac 32(e^{ix}-e^{-ix}) -3
=\frac 12(e^{3ix}-e^{-3ix}) -3 = \sinh(3x) - 3 =0
\)

So $x=\frac 13\arsinh(3)$.
And $u=\sinh(\frac 13\arsinh(3))\approx 0.644$.(2)

Define $u=\frac 12(x+y)$.
Then:

\(
4u^3+3u-3
=\frac{4}{2^3}(x+y)^3+\frac 32(x+y)-3
=\frac 12(x^3+y^3+3xy(x+y)) + \frac 32 (x+y) - 3 \\
=\frac 12(x^3+y^3-6) + \frac 32 (xy + 1)(x+y)
= 0
\)

We have the freedom to pick $y$ arbitrarily and we pick $y$ such that \( xy+1=0 \Rightarrow y=-\frac 1x \).
It follows that:

\( x^3+y^3-6=x^3-x^{-3}-6=0 \Rightarrow (x^3)^2-6(x^3)-1=0
\Rightarrow x^3=3\pm\sqrt{10} \\
\Rightarrow x=\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}+3}\lor x=-\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}-3}
\)

Since the same solutions will hold if we had swapped $x$ and $y$, we can conclude that we can pick $x$ to be the first solution and $y$ to be the second solution.
Substituting gives us \( u=\frac 12\left(\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}+3} - \sqrt[3]{\sqrt{10}-3}\right) \approx 0.644\).I see some similarity between both methods and I'm still wondering how close they are. (Thinking)
Brilliant, I like Serena! Your solution in (2). is new to me. Very nice indeed. Thankyou for your participation!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top